Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NQVBT8 from Oregon answered…8hrs8H

I think there should be houseless spaces. If you choose not to live in one of those spots or a house then it should be a…

 @9NQQH45 from Washington answered…9hrs9H

With the current state of homelessness, it is not an option as if there is no housing and they can't be outside where ar…

 @9NQP2F8 from Colorado answered…9hrs9H

This one’s tough because it may be there choice but outing them in encampments is dangerous for there own well-being.

 @9NQLGRR from Utah answered…10hrs10H

No, only certain public properties should be allowed for that, and current shelters need to be fixed so it is safer for…

 @9NQDDVS from California answered…11hrs11H

No, allow private charities to do take of this issue first.

 @9NQDDVS from California answered…11hrs11H

No, only if it causes a national or financial security risk.

 @9NQD6RQ from Georgia answered…11hrs11H

Yes but only for people who pay taxes, have a clean criminal record, and have made notices to the bank about their failu…

 @9NQ7VY2 from Ohio answered…13hrs13H

Yes, cut back on zoning regulations and let private developers build new houses, apartments, condos, etc.

 @9NQ7Q6B from Washington answered…13hrs13H

If one is provided with housing or shelter, and refuses, they should not be granted public land to use

 @9NPY624 from Massachusetts answered…16hrs16H

There are more vacant houses than homeless people in America. If a residential property has been vacant for more than a…

 @9NPXHFF from Texas answered…16hrs16H

All developments should include flood mitigation efforts which could include green spaces and parks.