Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MHJBZS from Arizona answered…57mins57m

Yes and no, in emergencies we should be able to do what we need to do but in none emergencies, it should go through cong…

 @9MHDH7Q answered…3hrs3H

I think that it's really situational, like force might be needed but congress should at the very least be AWARE.

 @9MHC7NY from Texas answered…4hrs4H

Depends on what the circumstances, if they attack US troops or any other allies and or their troops no, otherwise yes

 @9MH9HFM from Iowa answered…5hrs5H

in some cases this would be useful, but having this much power can lead to the abuse of it and unnecessary

 @9MH983M from Nevada answered…5hrs5H

the only instance where the president can use military force against Al-Qaeda is when a direct attack happens.

 @9MH83WT from Pennsylvania answered…6hrs6H

If absolutely needed then yes but there are more terrorist groups out there other than Al-Qaeda so focus on them too

 @9MH5JNW from North Dakota answered…7hrs7H

I think the president should be able to authorize attacks but must consult with congress before any action is taken.

 @9MH55ZR from Illinois answered…8hrs8H

yes they should unless in case of emergency such as severe threat to the nation then no they shouldnt

 @9MGY83T from New Jersey answered…14hrs14H

If we were attacked yes. If a conflict is erupting or on going and we are backing up our allys yes we should have congre…

 @9MGSRDY from North Carolina answered…21hrs21H

This depends if Al-Qaeda or other terrorist organizations are exasperated of planning a attack on the US gov or The Peop…

 @9MGR35K from Minnesota answered…23hrs23H

I'm conflicted, as on one hand, we should be quick to respond to major threats, but it's also hard to give one man all t…