Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M3QB9D from Colorado answered…14mins14m

No, the President holds the sole power to declare war, and is entirely capable of mobilizing military forces, but should…

 @9M3MRCX from Georgia answered…1hr1H

Only in times of dire need. If the president has to act fast and can't tell anyone that he/she should do so, but tell Co…

 @9M3BYHG from Oklahoma answered…4hrs4H

The President current signs way too many things he shouldn’t and politicians should have to stand by what they got voted…

 @9M2XM6X from Pennsylvania answered…12hrs12H

If the military force is used in defense or a pre-emptive measure against an imminent attack then yes. If it’s prolonged…

 @9M2XJXK from Indiana answered…12hrs12H

We shouldn’t create terrorist organizations to begin with and we shouldn’t have proxy wars with them.

 @9M2VW7Nfrom Maine  answered…14hrs14H

We should ask NATO to authorize the attack, and if they don't then attack, and if they do then not attack.

 @9M2RM98 from Michigan answered…17hrs17H

Yes but only the initial action if immediate response is needed; Congress must approve anything continuing.

 @9M2D76T from Colorado answered…23hrs23H

If there is an absolute and dire reason, then the president should be able to authorize military force.

 @9M29W85 from New York answered…24hrs24H

Yes, but if the people and congress continue feel like the decision was inappropriate then a withdrawal should happen.

 @9M29FRL from Virginia answered…24hrs24H

if the president feels as though their attack is severe enough and is happening quickly and the president couldn’t get a…

 @9M29BQR from Illinois answered…24hrs24H

No, one dude shouldn't be in charge of a whole country... definitely an old dude who 60-70 years old...