Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M2D76T from Colorado answered…3hrs3H

If there is an absolute and dire reason, then the president should be able to authorize military force.

 @9M29W85 from New York answered…4hrs4H

Yes, but if the people and congress continue feel like the decision was inappropriate then a withdrawal should happen.

 @9M29FRL from Virginia answered…4hrs4H

if the president feels as though their attack is severe enough and is happening quickly and the president couldn’t get a…

 @9M29BQR from Illinois answered…4hrs4H

No, one dude shouldn't be in charge of a whole country... definitely an old dude who 60-70 years old...

 @9M23H9H from Ohio answered…7hrs7H

The president should be able to make rapid decisions without approval during wartime scenarios, or major terrorism acts,…

 @9M22QKM from Texas answered…7hrs7H

If Al-Qaeda uses military force first then the president shouldn't need authoritzation from Congress. However, if Al-Qa…

 @9M22LCZ from North Carolina answered…7hrs7H

It depends, if there is an immediate threat to the United States the President shouldn't have to ask Congress for approv…

 @9LZQLBF from California answered…17hrs17H

Yes if its going to become a terroiste attack or a invasion from a enemy then the president has the right to call for th…

 @9LZK2TN from Missouri answered…22hrs22H

there is a fine line on this question. yes if there is a serious threat then actions should be taken but it should not…

 @9LZGYBD from Washington answered…24hrs24H

Yes, but only for limited strikes, and strategic missions. Not for invasion of sovereign countries or warfare.