Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M7GQZH answered…4hrs4H

Yes, non-governmental entities that pose an immediate threat do not require the same standards for military action.

 @9M7FDLV from Utah answered…5hrs5H

Yes and no, it should always depend on the situation that would need that approval and the Congress could provide an opi…

 @9M7F6FB from West Virginia answered…5hrs5H

Yes, to a certain extent of force, not causing wars because your scared of another terrorist attack, you shouldn’t put o…

 @9M7DPMX from Indiana answered…5hrs5H

No because this can and will lead to the military abusing their power and killing innocent civilians

 @9M7DFFP from Virginia answered…5hrs5H

It depends on the scenario. If we experience an event like 9/11 or any other mass casualty incident at home then preside…

 @9M7BNQ8 from Texas answered…6hrs6H

Yes, the president should be able to only deploy special forces to prevent or retaliate against attacks

 @9M7BCFB from Louisiana answered…6hrs6H

NO! Checks and Balances must always be used unless the President really needs to do something REALLY important.

 @9M79J5D from South Carolina answered…6hrs6H

President should only have the authority if an imminent threat is looming. All other situations should go through congre…

 @9M78MY5 from Texas answered…7hrs7H

It should be unauthorized if it is blatantly obvious that their is gonna be a suspected attack or we have been attacked.

 @9M76ZWP from New York answered…7hrs7H

if the president is sure about an attack coming and congress won't be able to give an answer in time then the president…

 @9M7685R from Texas answered…8hrs8H

Formal declaration of war requires congressional approval. Individual actions does not and the president should be able…