Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MHQPBH from Mississippi answered…5hrs5H

The President should have to convene the Joint Chiefs of Staff for decisions requiring swift action/higher clearance and…

 @9MHJBZS from Arizona answered…12hrs12H

Yes and no, in emergencies we should be able to do what we need to do but in none emergencies, it should go through cong…

 @9MHDH7Q answered…14hrs14H

I think that it's really situational, like force might be needed but congress should at the very least be AWARE.

 @9MHC7NY from Texas answered…15hrs15H

Depends on what the circumstances, if they attack US troops or any other allies and or their troops no, otherwise yes

 @9MH9HFM from Iowa answered…16hrs16H

in some cases this would be useful, but having this much power can lead to the abuse of it and unnecessary

 @9MH983M from Nevada answered…16hrs16H

the only instance where the president can use military force against Al-Qaeda is when a direct attack happens.

 @9MH83WT from Pennsylvania answered…16hrs16H

If absolutely needed then yes but there are more terrorist groups out there other than Al-Qaeda so focus on them too

 @9MH5JNW from North Dakota answered…18hrs18H

I think the president should be able to authorize attacks but must consult with congress before any action is taken.

 @9MH55ZR from Illinois answered…18hrs18H

yes they should unless in case of emergency such as severe threat to the nation then no they shouldnt