Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M8BCDR from Illinois answered…2hrs2H

The president should not be able to do what ever they want without getting approval from another part of the government

 @9M87Z6V from Wisconsin answered…3hrs3H

The President and Congress shouldn't be allowed to authorize military force against Al-Qaeda, rather it should be up to…

 @9M86754 from Kansas answered…4hrs4H

Yes, if the President has enough grounds to argue Congress is being irrational and risks American lives by not taking mi…

 @9M84VXR from West Virginia answered…6hrs6H

Yes, but long-term use of force should require Congressional authorization after reaching a set number of days.

 @9M7YN2Y from Indiana answered…13hrs13H

He should listen to his advisors and then do what they decide as a group. Too many in Congress to make a quick decision…

 @9M7Y7Q8 from California answered…13hrs13H

Fix our country first and only get involved if we the people are in danger not oil and corporate greed

 @9M7X92J from North Dakota answered…14hrs14H

Firstly congress should have to approve all military actions! The powers of the president involving troops I think were…

 @9M7WZC2 from Indiana answered…15hrs15H

No, should involve the President, Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Secretary of State (those with knowledge…

 @9M7GQZH answered…23hrs23H

Yes, non-governmental entities that pose an immediate threat do not require the same standards for military action.

 @9M7FDLV from Utah answered…24hrs24H

Yes and no, it should always depend on the situation that would need that approval and the Congress could provide an opi…

 @9M7F6FB from West Virginia answered…24hrs24H

Yes, to a certain extent of force, not causing wars because your scared of another terrorist attack, you shouldn’t put o…