Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M7F6FB from West Virginia answered…3mins3m

Yes, to a certain extent of force, not causing wars because your scared of another terrorist attack, you shouldn’t put o…

 @9M7DPMX from Indiana answered…14mins14m

No because this can and will lead to the military abusing their power and killing innocent civilians

 @9M7DFFP from Virginia answered…19mins19m

It depends on the scenario. If we experience an event like 9/11 or any other mass casualty incident at home then preside…

 @9M7BNQ8 from Texas answered…1hr1H

Yes, the president should be able to only deploy special forces to prevent or retaliate against attacks

 @9M7BCFB from Louisiana answered…1hr1H

NO! Checks and Balances must always be used unless the President really needs to do something REALLY important.

 @9M79J5D from South Carolina answered…2hrs2H

President should only have the authority if an imminent threat is looming. All other situations should go through congre…

 @9M78MY5 from Texas answered…2hrs2H

It should be unauthorized if it is blatantly obvious that their is gonna be a suspected attack or we have been attacked.

 @9M76ZWP from New York answered…3hrs3H

if the president is sure about an attack coming and congress won't be able to give an answer in time then the president…

 @9M7685R from Texas answered…3hrs3H

Formal declaration of war requires congressional approval. Individual actions does not and the president should be able…

 @9M6PL9H from New Jersey answered…19hrs19H

I think it is very important to take on terrorists and make sure there is not another attack. There should be a good amo…

 @9M6PMGRfrom Washington  answered…20hrs20H

The United States, in general, should stop supporting Israel and should not worry about Al-Qaeda unless it threatens an…