Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M2XM6X from Pennsylvania answered…3hrs3H

If the military force is used in defense or a pre-emptive measure against an imminent attack then yes. If it’s prolonged…

 @9M2XJXK from Indiana answered…3hrs3H

We shouldn’t create terrorist organizations to begin with and we shouldn’t have proxy wars with them.

 @9M2VW7Nfrom Maine  answered…5hrs5H

We should ask NATO to authorize the attack, and if they don't then attack, and if they do then not attack.

 @9M2RM98 from Michigan answered…8hrs8H

Yes but only the initial action if immediate response is needed; Congress must approve anything continuing.

 @9M2D76T from Colorado answered…14hrs14H

If there is an absolute and dire reason, then the president should be able to authorize military force.

 @9M29W85 from New York answered…15hrs15H

Yes, but if the people and congress continue feel like the decision was inappropriate then a withdrawal should happen.

 @9M29FRL from Virginia answered…15hrs15H

if the president feels as though their attack is severe enough and is happening quickly and the president couldn’t get a…

 @9M29BQR from Illinois answered…15hrs15H

No, one dude shouldn't be in charge of a whole country... definitely an old dude who 60-70 years old...

 @9M23H9H from Ohio answered…17hrs17H

The president should be able to make rapid decisions without approval during wartime scenarios, or major terrorism acts,…

 @9M22QKM from Texas answered…18hrs18H

If Al-Qaeda uses military force first then the president shouldn't need authoritzation from Congress. However, if Al-Qa…

 @9M22LCZ from North Carolina answered…18hrs18H

It depends, if there is an immediate threat to the United States the President shouldn't have to ask Congress for approv…