F-35

Discuss Follow Share

+

Expand

Start a discussion

Sort by

Filters

Current selected filters:

x F-35

Choose more filters:

0

Replies

@Paxton-LarcherDemocrat from Virginia answered…1yr

Yes, Only after they have found a suitable replacement

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@super-shluffyDemocrat from Florida answered…2yrs

Yes, instead use those funds to develop the next generation of fighter that is cheaper to produce, and cheaper to mainta...

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@IAN-BRISCOEPeace and Freedom from Wisconsin answered…1yr

No, but only produce a limited amount

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Carl-WebsterGreen from Georgia answered…2yrs

Personally I love the aircraft. But we shouldn’t stay in the past.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Sarah-GehoVeteran from Delaware answered…2yrs

Only produce the bare minimum international intelligence says is needed for security purposes.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Jake-CookAmerican from Colorado answered…2yrs

Cancel no. Limit yes.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Ed-HardenVeteran from Maryland answered…2yrs

The program should be reviewed and audited before funding continues.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@ObiWan-BonoboVeteran from Wisconsin answered…2yrs

No, but there should be no further investment of funds until delivery is made of functioning fighter.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Margaret-Schluet…Peace and Freedom from North Carolina answered…2yrs

No, we shouldn't be at war either.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Patrick-James-Fa…Working Family from Virginia answered…2yrs

Don’t cancel it completely but make less of them to lower cost.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Rick-LeenTranshumanist from Wisconsin answered…2yrs

Yes, but lower how many we produce

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Aidan-YuProgressive from Illinois answered…2yrs

No, but there should be a hard limit on how many are produced

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Jess-BainWomen’s Equality from Georgia answered…2yrs

there should be less military spending. A country is only as strong as its weakest link.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@J.c.-ElamVeteran from Michigan answered…2yrs

No, they are basically designing three complete aircraft from the ground up. Should the spending/cost be looked at certa...

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Abraham_I-LacayoDemocrat answered…2yrs

No, since it is now too far into production and service, but revise procurement procedures and audit milestones along th...

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Mark-CummingsDemocrat from Maryland answered…2yrs

No, but the amount of F-35 fighters being constructed should be decreased.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Jonathan-TorontoRepublican answered…2yrs

Reduce spending without cancellation of program

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Scott-AndersonTranshumanist from Connecticut answered…2yrs

If spending can be decreased, do so.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Adam-Reagan-B.-W…Transhumanist from Virginia answered…2yrs

Yes, create a new and improved fighter

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Amy-Zwahlen-Youn…Veteran from Ohio answered…2yrs

No but maybe not as many produced by 2037.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Maril-KeomeWomen’s Equality from California answered…2yrs

Do not know enough about this.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Parker-BrademannVeteran from Georgia answered…2yrs

Yes, the F22 is sufficient

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Moses-OcampoRepublican answered…2yrs

No. Despite its current failures the F-35 is still a very promising fighter. Invest more research and refinement instead...

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Hayden-BryantDemocratfrom Florida answered…2yrs

Yes, but only if it won't put the US into more debt.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

0

Replies

@Patrick-MIndependent from Massachusetts answered…2yrs

No, reduce the fleet number.

Answer Foreign Policy F-35

Show more