Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1 day1D

New Energy Rules Will Add $31K To The Cost Of New Home

  1710 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…24hrs24H

Kenya Confronts Catastrophic Floods: A Nation Under Water

  1514 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2 days2D

Colorado Strikes Groundbreaking Climate and Energy Compromise

  1110 replies

 @Gr33nPartySheep from Texas submitted…2 days2D

Dark Money Group Backs Climate Change Lawsuits Filed By Children

  6replies

 @9M29BQR from Illinois answered…3hrs3H

No, the more you try to fix "climate change" the worse it will get.. also if they really cared, they already have the an…

 @9M28642 from North Carolina answered…4hrs4H

Yes, they should, and should also ban certain factory's that produce certain co2 emissions and tax very highly on compan…

 @9M26VX5 from Utah answered…4hrs4H

Yes, put more regulations on businesses and corporations while allowing individuals to still use fossil fuels

 @9M26223 from West Virginia answered…5hrs5H

yes and no. global warming i believe is a natural occurance, but that shouldnt mean we dont need regulations for a healt…

 @9M23RRW from Ohio answered…6hrs6H

It all just depends on how far they want to take it. I don't think the regulations should be excessive.

 @9LZZFM2 from Tennessee answered…7hrs7H

Yes, only if the cost does not detract from sectors such as health benefits, veterans benefits, and social benefits.

 @9LZRWK6 from Arizona answered…14hrs14H

Yes but focus on the actual pollutants like the shipping industry, power plants that burn fossil fuels, etc.