In certain exceptional circumstances, the revocation of certain constitutional personal freedoms may be justified for the greater good of society. One such example could be during a severe public health crisis, where individual freedoms might need to be temporarily restricted to prevent the spread of a highly contagious and deadly disease. However, the suspension of constitutional freedoms should always be approached with extreme caution, transparency, and accountability. Additionally, any such measures should be time-limited, proportional to the threat at hand, and subject to regular review to prevent abuse of power and ensure the restoration of rights once the crisis has abated. The argument for revoking constitutional personal freedoms should be a last resort, applied only in the most exceptional circumstances and with careful consideration of the potential consequences.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.