Should there be more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun?
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
Mass extinction have been proven to be effective in cases where nations disarm their citizens, allowing Tyrannical governments to emerge. Furthermore, stand your ground laws have been proven to work; individuals that have been attacked are required to stand firm with a reasonable defense strategy, and national enforcement of a stand your ground law would be a better option for lowering death rates for law abiding citizens from criminals.
@9H4GXFX6mos6MO
Some of the key reasons are detailed below. Criminals, by definition, do not obey the law. Gun control laws only affect law-abiding people who go through legal avenues to obtain firearms. Criminals overwhelmingly obtain their firearms through illegal channels and will never be deterred by state and federal laws.
@9H4GVPJ6mos6MO
The United States already is a tyrannical argument. Capitalism reigns supreme, and the US government just loves to back coups and fight wars across the world to fight against people that threaten it or some rich persons capital. It's **** ing awful and imperialistic. You also fail to consider that most if not all politically stable nations around the world have tight gun control laws. Australia, Europe and more are proven to be very stable and have tight gun control. The United States government is already tyrannical, and its their own fault for getting there. Because of the unfortunate circumstances the US finds itself in, in the context of it it has become nessesary for individuals to carry guns! I think that's sad. It should never come to that.
The historical activity of users engaging with this agreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
