CRT literally does nothing against preventing discrimination, but rather somewhat suggests to discriminate against the majority ethnicities than to actually help those impacted by discrimination within politics, society, and economic opportunities, and despite all these amendments meant to ensure rights of purchasing property, freedoms, and voting, all institutions and history are deemed “inherently racist”, even if those institutions or history are in no way race related to begin with. The real issue is social bigotry, which CRT is an ironic example of. But this does not mean the past should be completely ignored, but rather used as an example of what not to do, not to be made a staple of modern arguments about race.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.