@VulcanMan6 10mos10MO
That sounds to me like a pretty good way of saying "I have no real rebuttal against it, I just don't like it because I hate the idea of a healthy society that provides for each other."
Also, do you actually mean "the government" or "the state"..? Because those are two different concepts. A government is merely whatever organized means a society uses to make decisions, so if you're anti-government, then how do you believe societal decisions should be made? Violent free for all?
@TruthHurts10110mos10MO
No, I believe the government should defend our rights, which means stopping crimes, but do nothing more, because more than that is a crime.
@VulcanMan6 10mos10MO
So you're not actually "anti-state", because clearly you still believe it should exist to uphold military/police presence, uphold laws and legal contracts, likely some form of a court or judiciary system to enforce them, etc...right? So like I suggested in another reply, you're not actually "anti-state", you're just some form of a Libertarian-Capitalist. You still want a state to exist, you would just disagree with others over the extents of what they should have/do, but you're not ideologically nor fundamentally "anti-state".
Also, things that… Read more
@TruthHurts10110mos10MO
"Crimes" are actually defined by God in the Bible, and I believe in the Rule of Higher Law, not the Rule of Government Law. Therefore crimes against God can be committed by both government and individuals, and both must be punished. The government should only exist as an enforcement arm for the Laws of God but do nothing else, which means away with 99 percent of it
@VulcanMan6 10mos10MO
Oh so you are also blatantly Theocratic? So you are only economically libertarian, yet politically you are authoritarian. Got it, I figured as much...
