Who you love shouldn’t be a religion’s or government’s business, and any laws dictating who one should love or marry should be abolished. For marriage licenses, all that should be required is two or more people above the legal age and capable of consenting. Nothing more. Love means different things to different people, and the governments shouldn’t decide what type of love or people are allowed to get married.
@lemans3427Republican 1yr1Y
It's true that governments shouldn't dictate who one should love or marry, but there are some who argue that the legalization of same-sex marriage undermines the traditional definition of marriage. They believe that marriage should only be between a man and a woman, as that is the only natural union that can produce offspring. For example, in 2015, Chief Justice Roberts dissented in the landmark case of Obergefell v. Hodges, arguing that marriage has always been defined as a union between a man and a woman, and that it is not the role of the judiciary to redefine it. What do you think? Is the traditional definition of marriage something that should be preserved?
