Yes

Authoritarian growing powers, such as Russia and China, which seek to dominate their respective regions and expand their power and influence in the region, and the wide reach of NATO provides a source of stability and security for North America and Western Europe, as well as providing a framework and a general sense of values which unite NATO members and allow for common goals.

NATO should remain in its current form, but it should not admit any new member states. The organisation should similarly demand that all nations part of it should meet the expected defence spending of 2% of their GDP.

Number of NATO countries invaded (yet): 0
Number of European (and Eurasian)countries not in NATO invaded by Russia alone: more than 0

Nato was formed to counter the Soviet Union and the expansion of Communism. With the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 and little to none Communist countries remaining, there is no reason for Nato to stay around.

I feel like the NATO is a mother definition for something that you need and not something you just want but also can mean an argument .

nato you need every vote to say yes so if there is a major issue regarding a country in NATO they will vote no on their country so nothing gets done

The reason the United States should withdrawal from NATO is because if one country in Europe gets invaded then we are all dragged into a war nobody wants to fight.

It causes more war and problems on a global level without caring about the people on the local level .

NATO allows easy access to the global stage for the US and the American army, giving the US the ability to have a say anywhere on the globe. Why should we sacrifice that ability? Critics of NATO often aren’t anti-military spending. China has a larger standing army than America, yet dwarfs in comparison to political power. This is large in part to the mass security guarantees that the US provides, and that China does not.

We haven't had a war on Western European or US soil since WWII. The strength of NATO hindered the USSR to invade Western Europe and thus starting WWIII. Today, we are in a similar situation.

That they should make more of the people go out and help the others and give them a permit on their stuff.

NATO is an important multilateral decision-making organization that has expanded outside of its initial goals of countering the Soviet Union.

Consensus decision-making means that there is no voting at NATO. Consultations take place until a decision that is acceptable to all is reached. Sometimes

I think that now more than ever, America is at risk of being attacked. I believe that by leaving NATO, we leave ourselves as a sitting duck without our allies.

The United States shouldn't continue subsidizing European welfare states of NATO members who do not meet the 2% contribution threshold while we run massive deficits.

If the United States separated from NATO, we would easily be attacked by a foreign country without the defense of NATO. This would cause many wars without the help of other countries.