Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerWhat was the original position of the country at its inception? That is what it should be now. But the insurance groups and legal groups should give equal treatment to each group. And like in male female marriage, civil unions should have equal representation in the systems. |
the Economy › Equal Pay
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Identity
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
4>4 Personal answerAs long as it is not a money making program/business . If becomes that then it should not be allowed. |
the Environment › Climate Change
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerYes! only 2 six year terms only! |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerIt's going to happen but, the police not the Islamic groups should be doing the patrolling of the neighborhoods, keeping the law of the land, not any one groups beliefs. |
Education › Student Loans
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Death Penalty
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Confederate Flag
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Government Mandates
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerYes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Medicaid
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
4>4 Personal answerNo, and the government should never support unproven technologies |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases |
Elections › Voter Fraud
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Israel
4>4 Personal answerYes, but respect Israel’s sovereignty and do not dictate how it should interact with its neighbors |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › First Amendment
4>4 Personal answerThey do not have to do that to state that though the government is separate, and non supportive of any religion, it can reflect the nations original position. If that is the choice then the removal of such might be a choice they would choose. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
4>4 Personal answerYes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Euthanasia
4>4 Personal answerIt's between them, their assistant and, if they believe, their God. |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Labor Unions
4>4 Personal answerThey do both and it establishes an area of power that should not be. But it will be and the people will suffer. |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Education › Common Core
4>4 Personal answerNo, teach to each student's potential instead of uniform testing |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
4>4 Personal answerNo, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. |
Healthcare › Obamacare
4>4 Personal answerYes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects |
the Environment › Fracking
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerDecrease, and not aid those countries that have human rights violations, to include children marrying adults, or use in warfare! |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
4>4 Personal answerHave China use our weapons to strike N.Korea in that particular area as well as go in and dismantle the system of nuclear weapons and ICBM's! |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
4>4 Personal answerNot until they can be found corded in, in an area, or are attacking the USA here! |
Foreign Policy › Drones
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only with permission from the country in question |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › War on ISIS
4>4 Personal answerHang the united nations, it shouldn't be here in the first place. They want to dictate what we can do in this country when almost all of them have and are doing worse! But No, not until they attack the USA directly. Until that happens we should not give them the power of recognition. Then, those of its relationship should step up to the plate to also protect the country from the evil it knows and sees and learns of! |
Science › Space Exploration
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
4>4 Personal answerInvest in home and build home while investing in a USA banking system, not the privately owned Federal Reserve . Then invest in another country and not in the money system of the banking industries. |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
4>4 Personal answerYes! and the government should plan a national bank while eliminating that privately own program. According to some sources, this private system slipped off large amounts, giving it to a religious group, keeping funds going to both sides of a war as the then president learned. It seems each time a political move was brought up to remove this branch and make a national one established and controlled by government, the ones that push that idea were harmed or became deathly ill or suddenly died. |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo, and abolish the NSA |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
4>4 Personal answerIt was getting our money anyway! people would leave the US, go to Mexico and head to Cuba for enjoyable activity, or business. |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
4>4 Personal answerCommercial companies paid farmers to plant what they wanted or not plant at all. Thus, instead of real farming where there is a rotation of various crops, which would always re-nourish the ground, the ground is now like the dust-bowl of the early 2oth century. So, if the government were to pay the farmer it should be to first nourish the ground and then to plant a rotative selection of plants that would continue the helping and enriching of the soil. |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
4>4 Personal answeronly if the companies paid those outside the US the same wage, that the product coming to this country must sale for 10% higher than that same product made in the US |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.