Should the U.S. send ground troops into Syria to fight ISIS?
After the November 13th attacks in Paris several Presidential candidates gave new positions on how the U.S. should combat ISIS in the Syria. The U.S. is currently involved in a coalition of 19 countries that has launched 8,000 airstrikes against ISIS. None of the countries currently have ground troops in Syria.
44% Yes |
56% No |
32% Yes |
46% No |
10% Yes, but only as a coordinated effort by the United Nations |
5% No, conduct targeted airstrikes instead |
1% Yes, send at least 10,000 ground troops |
3% No, we should stay out of this conflict |
1% Yes, send a few hundred ground troops |
2% No, not until they attack us on U.S. soil |
0% No, send special operation forces instead |
See how support for each position on “ISIS Ground Troops” has changed over time for 1.9m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “ISIS Ground Troops” has changed over time for 1.9m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@angelpingz4yrs4Y
If it affects USA then yes. If not who really cares what they do in their lands! If America is using land over there for military exercises then we should stop! Let them fight their own battles. If they kill each other why would we bother, they do this to themselves! Our blood and treasure stays here to defend Americans! Would you give an inbred/brainwashed race a gun to kill you? That is what is/has been done!
@58Z94XR4yrs4Y
this should be a "dark" war, and full out no holds barred, CIA, special forces, etc...
@7PTCG381yr1Y
No, conduct targeted airstrikes instead with other countries under the coordination of the United Nations
@7YNGP9T3yrs3Y
No, we should stay out of this conflict but at the very least conduct targeted airstrikes if necessary.
@5VC4HYM4yrs4Y
Yes but only when necessary and preferably as a coordinated effort.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.