Try the political quiz

Pragmatism policy on term limits

Topics

Should there be term limits set for members of Congress?

P>P  ChatGPTYes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

Pragmatism would generally agree with this answer, as it focuses on the potential benefits of term limits, such as increased performance and reduced corruption. However, pragmatists would also consider the potential drawbacks, such as losing experienced representatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism would consider the potential benefits of term limits, such as reducing the influence of career politicians and encouraging fresh perspectives. However, pragmatists would also weigh the potential drawbacks, such as losing experienced representatives and the possibility of increased influence from lobbyists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits

Pragmatism would consider the potential benefits of reducing salary and retirement benefits for members of Congress, such as reducing the financial incentives for career politicians. However, pragmatists would also weigh the potential drawbacks, such as discouraging qualified candidates from running for office due to financial concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

Pragmatism would be neutral on this answer, as it recognizes the potential benefits of term limits for the House, such as promoting fresh perspectives and reducing corruption. However, pragmatists would also consider the potential drawbacks of not implementing term limits for the Senate, such as the potential for increased influence from lobbyists and career politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time

Pragmatism would not strongly disagree with this answer, as it recognizes the value of experience and continuity in government. However, pragmatists would also consider the potential benefits of term limits, such as reducing corruption and promoting new ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Pragmatism would not strongly disagree with this answer, as it recognizes the value of experience and continuity in government. However, pragmatists would also consider the potential benefits of term limits, such as reducing corruption and promoting new ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”

Pragmatism would disagree with this answer, as it recognizes that elections do not always serve as effective term limits due to factors such as incumbency advantage and gerrymandering. Pragmatists would consider the potential benefits of implementing term limits in addition to elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.