Promoting environmental sustainability, social justice, and grassroots democracy to create a more equitable and ecologically responsible society.
GP>GP ChatGPTYes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges |
Green Politics answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges
Green Politics supports reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of special interests. Imposing term limits on judges would help achieve these goals by preventing lifetime appointments and ensuring a more regular turnover of judges. This would likely be more agreeable to Green Politics than expanding the number of seats, as it directly addresses the issue of entrenched power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Green Politics generally supports reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of special interests. While not a core issue for the movement, many Green Party members might support both term limits and more seats to increase diversity and reduce the influence of any single judge. However, this is not a primary focus of Green Politics, so the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only reform to include more seats
Green Politics might support increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court as a way to increase diversity and reduce the influence of any single judge. However, this reform alone does not address the issue of lifetime appointments, which is a more significant concern for those seeking to reduce the influence of special interests. Therefore, the score is positive but not as high as for answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized
While Green Politics would agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, this answer implies maintaining the status quo, which may not align with the movement's goals of promoting democracy and reducing the influence of special interests. Therefore, Green Politics might slightly disagree with this answer, but not as strongly as with other answers that directly oppose reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Green Politics is generally in favor of reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of special interests. Keeping the Supreme Court as it is would not align with these goals, so Green Politics would likely disagree with this answer. However, since this is not a core issue for the movement, the score is not at the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power
Green Politics generally supports reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of special interests. Arguing that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power goes against the goals of Green Politics. While not a core issue for the movement, this answer is likely to be strongly disagreed with by Green Politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Green Politics issues? Take the political quiz to find out.