More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 53 seconds ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by news.com.au
5 years ago by allout.org
6 years ago by twentytwowords.com
6 years ago by bbc.co.uk
6 years ago by upworthy.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Who cares? If they want to pay the "marriage" penalty let whomever wishes to marry anyone they want as many times as they want. What difference does it make to me what my neighbors are doing in their bedroom. It is none of my business. Only a... 6 years ago from a Green in Strasburg, VA
I think the states should decide, but the definition of marriage should not be changed. 6 years ago from a Republican in Ceres, CA
Don't have the government define marriage at all. Have a legal document for co-domestication, or whatever it ends up being called, but leave the definition of marriage as a personal definition. 6 years ago from a Republican in Layton, UT
Why is the government allowed to define relationships?. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Euclid, OH
Why not abolish marriage and all other religious beliefs at once rather than piecemeal. 6 years ago from a Green in Redmond, OR
Protect churches right to marry who they wish. But the state must do civil marriage. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Show Low, AZ
If gay marriage is allowed, so should polygamy and other non-traditional marriages. If not, no !. 6 years ago from a Green in Marengo, IL
They should be allowed to marry but not in churches where that is against the church's beliefs. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Pleasant Hope, MO
Allow gay marriage to be held only in city halls or courts or anything that has to do with the States for all 50 States and allow these ceremonies to be held in accepted Churches of religion. Whomever disagrees may not take violent action. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Fort Washington, MD
Allow civil unions for same-sex couples but don't call it marriage, but have equal benefits to what married couples have. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lewisville, TX
Call all "marriages" civil unions for govt purposes, and let religion decide what they want to call marriage. 6 years ago from a Republican in Charles City, IA