More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income (Less than $25K) voters
Last answered 1 minute ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income (Less than $25K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by news.com.au
5 years ago by allout.org
6 years ago by twentytwowords.com
6 years ago by bbc.co.uk
6 years ago by upworthy.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
I think the states should decide, but the definition of marriage should not be changed. 6 years ago from a Republican in Ceres, CA
We need to decide what marriage in the eyes of the state means before we can state. and we need to re evaluate the differences between civil unions and marriage, and if marriage is incompatible with same sex relationships, focus more on civil union reform... 6 years ago from a Republican in Phoenix, AZ
The institution of marriage should be abolished in its entirety. All citizens should be entitled to the same rights and protections, regardless of sexual orientation. 6 years ago from a Green in Milwaukee, WI
Marriage can be between any two people but unless they have the ability to procreate the species they get no tax breaks, churches can decide who they want to allow to be married in their facilities. 6 years ago from a Republican in Winter Haven, FL
Marriage should be seperated from the ritual, churches should not be required to marry everyone but, I believe it is financially a better decision to be inclusive of multiple no traditional types of relationships for marriages. 6 years ago from a Green in Moffett, AR
Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision. Replace marriage under the law with civil unions. Provide government benefits and rights through civil unions, only. People can choose to have a religious marriage, a civil... 6 years ago from a Republican in Normal, IL
I don't need the state to sanction marriage. It's a religious institution. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Baton Rouge, LA
Government should not be involved with this. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in New Orleans, LA
Marriage should be between a man and a woman. A civil union should be allowed for benefit purposes (insurances, retirements, inheritances, etc.). HOWEVER, the government has no right to force citizens to serve people who are engaging in a civil union,... 6 years ago from a Republican in Aransas Pass, TX
Yes, but not allowed to adopt. Children need a mother and a father. Look at the prison's and you'll see 90% of them were raised by single parents.... usually the mothers. 6 years ago from a Republican in Marietta, GA
Don't have the government define marriage at all. Have a legal document for co-domestication, or whatever it ends up being called, but leave the definition of marriage as a personal definition. 6 years ago from a Republican in Layton, UT
I don't believe in marriage. 6 years ago from a Republican in Washington, DC
Each one of us eventually has to answer to God for the choices we make in life. I don't think God intended for same sex relationship, I am not here to judge. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Birmingham, AL
Take the government out of marriage and make it a religious decision, while allowing civil unions for both heterosexual and homosexual union's benefits. 6 years ago from a Republican in North Little Rock, AR
Yes, as long as it is beneficial on taxes for straight couples, it should be or all couples. Otherwise, the government should stay out. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in High Point, NC
Homosexuality is just plain abnormal! It should not be encouraged by making a public declaration of such sickening behavior!. 6 years ago from a Republican in Tucson, AZ
Call all "marriages" civil unions for govt purposes, and let religion decide what they want to call marriage. 6 years ago from a Republican in Charles City, IA
I doesn't matter to me, if they want to be with the same sex as themselveds, then let it be. It is whatever makes them happy. 6 years ago from a Green in Jacksonville, AL
Let government definitions and religious definitions differ, let all that applies to the government apply to government marriages and vice versa. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Boone, NC