In 2014 the U.S. Senate blocked the Paycheck Fairness Act which would make it illegal for employers to pay unequal wages to men and women who perform the same work. The goals of the act were to make wages more transparent, require employers to prove that wage discrepancies are tied to legitimate business qualifications and not gender and prohibiting companies from taking retaliatory action against employees who raise concerns about gender-based wage discrimination. Opponents argue that studies which show pay gaps don’t take into account women who take jobs that are more family-friendl…
Read more79% Yes |
21% No |
77% Yes |
9% No |
2% Yes, and businesses should be required to publish their salary ranges for each position |
9% No, there are too many other variables such as education, experience, and tenure that determine a fair salary |
2% No, the government should never determine what a private business should pay employees |
|
0% No, this is irrelevant because the gender wage gap is a myth |
|
0% No, the current requirements in the Equal Pay Act of 1963 are already sufficient |
See how support for each position on “Equal Pay” has changed over time for 14.5m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Equal Pay” has changed over time for 14.5m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8MLB4GS3yrs3Y
No, it should depend how much each peron works.
@8FDMGXN4yrs4Y
I believe that people are already paid the same. People don't account for the danger of jobs and the kinds of jobs that women and men have.
@4LP27P53yrs3Y
It depends on how well they do their job and how long they have been doing their job, jobs can't be used as labels for income. Some jobs where 2 men have the same job one of them still receives better pay because they have done a better job. Feminists need to quit being so vague with their protests and worry about getting better at their job to increase their income instead of acting entitled.
@8GN4YCZ4yrs4Y
Yes, and businesses should be required to publish their salary ranges for each position. Although, many statistics are based off of the 1970s-80s
@4LMWJT23yrs3Y
I think there should be tax incentives for single income married couples w children. Women should be paid equally
@4NYJQPP3yrs3Y
I have yet to hear anyone explain the wage gap in a way that makes economic sense.
That it exists is unquestioned but until you know why it exist you legislating a result is counter productive: equal pay legislation is flat stupid. As an employer I will tell you that equal pay will result in fewer women being hired and separation of male and female carrier paths. I would support an 'affirmative action like' program for women
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Equal Pay” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH3 days3D
The Indiana Fever selected Clark with the No. 1 overall pick in Monday's 2024 draft, which they were expected to do after winning the draft lottery back in December.Clark elected to forgo her last year of eligibility with Iowa, which made fans wonder: What would her salary be in the WNBA?Here's what to know about Clark's WNBA salary entering her first contract with the Fever:What is Caitlin Clark's WNBA salary?Clark is expected to make $338,056 over four years with Indiana, according to Spotrac.How much will Caitlin Clark make per year in the WNBA?Here's how Clark's $338,056 salary will be spread out over four seasons, via Spotrac:2024: $76,5352025: $78,0662026: $85,8732027: $97,582 (option)
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
UPS fell short of Wall Street revenue estimates Tuesday, reporting drops in shipping volume, both internationally and domestically, in its fourth-quarter earnings report. The company also announced 12,000 layoffs as part of an effort to align resources in 2024.The workforce reductions will save the…
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH11yrs11Y
@ISIDEWITH3wks3W
In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.