More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (Single Moms) voters
Last answered 6 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (Single Moms) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
8 years ago by indiatimes.com
8 years ago by net.au
8 years ago by youtube.com
8 years ago by politicalears.com
10 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, allow limited drilling and forestry, using best practical ecological means, as well as use hunting to control over population of some species. 9 years ago from a Republican in Carlsbad, TX
It is my view parks should have portions that would be farmed for timber for example and refurbished. Use the example of Epcot using hydroponic growth for food. If they were a self sustaining by using their products for monies that would only be given back to the parks. I have seen where trees die because they have not thinned out, so not touching something does not always guarantee the best solution.
Secondly, the states that have these parks should have a vote in the decision making. 9 years ago from a Republican in Ocala, FL
National Parks should continue to be preserved as a national park nominally by the government. however all forms of protection and natural upkeep should be handled by willing members of the public that enjoy and preserve the park already. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Glendale, AZ
Yes, if it were not for preservation rules in place we would not have our wonderful natural areas that have survived to this day and are some of the last remaining! Keep them. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Miami, FL
Yes but should allow for individuals to log, mine or access lands for personal NON-commercial use. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Denver, CO
Yes. but let the states have a say in what land is added to the parks registry and i think that more land should be set aside for national parks. i also think that the budget for national parks should be offset by maybe a fee charged to tourist. most... 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Roanoke, LA
Yes, but some land should put up so citizens can take a random piece of land (the size always being the same but location random) instead of social security. 9 years ago from a Republican in West Palm Beach, FL
Yes, but no more new acquisitions, the EPA stops over- regulating and the government should sell land back to private citizens whenever feasible. 9 years ago from a Republican in Mission, KS
Yes, but with no drilling or mining. There should be more publicly available fruit and vegetable plants, and the wildlife and trees should still be protected. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Little Rock, AR
The majority of superfund sites are owned by the government. They have proven unreliable when it comes to protecting the environment. 9 years ago from a Republican in Lafayette, IN
The government seems anal about some factors of park management and tends to go more politically based and also more profit based. Their "experts" on fire management, where applicable, appear to be uninformed on issues and make many mistakes on... 9 years ago from a Republican in Mariposa, CA
No i believe that the national parks should be privately owned and operated. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Whitehall, PA
The National Parks should be returned to their rightful and legal owner: The Native American Nation. 9 years ago from a Green in Conshohocken, PA
Yes, but allow more public access alonside limited logging, drilling, and mining. 9 years ago from a Republican in Tulare, CA
Yes, but protect the Wild Mustangs from the slaughter caused by the Bureau of Land Management and other wildlife caused by the Wildlife Agencies of the USDA. 9 years ago from a Republican in Scottdale, GA
Let Natural wildfires burn, don't rescue people, leave them free to enter the way Pres. Teddy Roosevelt envisioned. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Spruce Pine, NC
Yes but with the assistance of employable and qualified unemployed Americans – including those who wish for a change of career. This would be one more small step toward improving the unemployment rate which is still quite high. Have you noted the... 9 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
Laws should be in place to keep the land from being destroyed, however the park should be manage by a private firm. That way a small profit could be made to help improve the parks, along with people being fired by the private firm if mistake are made. 9 years ago from a Republican in Fayetteville, NC
Long-term agreements should be available to local and state governments as well as certain corporate entities as ANYONE manages more efficiently than the Feds. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Kent, WA
Yes, but if the gov't is going to lease property within these spaces to private business, they should not be allowed to just shut the privately owned business down. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Capitol Heights, MD