More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 6 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
8 years ago by indiatimes.com
8 years ago by net.au
8 years ago by youtube.com
9 years ago by politicalears.com
10 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
National Parks should continue to be preserved as a national park nominally by the government. however all forms of protection and natural upkeep should be handled by willing members of the public that enjoy and preserve the park already. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Glendale, AZ
Yes but should allow for individuals to log, mine or access lands for personal NON-commercial use. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Denver, CO
Should be a joint non partisan endeavor between each state and the Federal Goverment. 9 years ago from a Republican in Cache, OK
The Federal Government cannot be trusted. 9 years ago from a Green in San Francisco, CA
The majority of superfund sites are owned by the government. They have proven unreliable when it comes to protecting the environment. 9 years ago from a Republican in Lafayette, IN
Allow limited logging and possible drilling and mining and allow more public access. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Summerfield, FL
Yes, but allow more public access alonside limited logging, drilling, and mining. 9 years ago from a Republican in Tulare, CA
Yes, but we must fund those protections adequately, allowing limited non-damaging usage of those parklands. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Albuquerque, NM
Allow for the private sector to make inputs on some National Park lands. If the federal government cannot afford to keep the land, sell to someone or something (denoting a corporation or what have you) who is willing to preserve said property for future... 9 years ago from a Republican in Canton, NY
Let Natural wildfires burn, don't rescue people, leave them free to enter the way Pres. Teddy Roosevelt envisioned. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Spruce Pine, NC
Yes but with the assistance of employable and qualified unemployed Americans – including those who wish for a change of career. This would be one more small step toward improving the unemployment rate which is still quite high. Have you noted the... 9 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
In my opinion, they could perhaps be protected by the state government. That would be one less thing the federal government would have to deal with, giving them more time and energy to focus on making the economy stable and golfing. 9 years ago from a Libertarian in Ozark, AR
Yes, but not lower the protection slightly. 9 years ago from a Republican in Blackstone, IL
Our National Parks are a treasure of open lands that should be preserved for as long as is practical to prevent the loss of all of our wilderness areas. 9 years ago from a Democrat in Pflugerville, TX