More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Texas voters
Last answered 9 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Texas voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
6 years ago by thefreethoughtproject.com
6 years ago by indiatimes.com
6 years ago by afr.com
7 years ago by smh.com.au
7 years ago by indiatimes.com
7 years ago by bbc.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Only in circumstances where there is no other way to prevent imminent danger to other's lives. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Houston, TX
The justice system has excuted people on a broken investagative system, but in some cases a death sentence is the apporiate sentence. When the evidedence is unquestenable there should not be lengthy appeals that tie up the legal system, the sentence... 7 years ago from a Republican in Waco, TX
The death penalty should be allowed for major crimes where the evidence is virtually conclusive in showing guilt, the individual has no impediment to seeing the wrongfulness of their crimes, and the individual's motive was clearly wrongful;... 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Addison, TX
Only in the case of extremely heinous crimes that can be proven beyond any doubt - more definitive than only eye-witness testimony. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Spring, TX
Yes but only under circumstances where the evidence is undisputed that the heinous crime resulting in the death of another has been committed. If any doubt has been raised in the evidence, the person should not be killed. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Dallas, TX
Only if it's absolutely 100% proven without the possibility of false accusation and after every detail is exhausted. Because once the person is executed, they can't answer any more questions.. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Allen, TX