More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (Single Moms) voters
Last answered 6 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (Single Moms) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by thefreethoughtproject.com
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
5 years ago by afr.com
5 years ago by smh.com.au
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
5 years ago by bbc.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes and no. If they have dna and a confirmation of the crime then it could be a tooth for a tooth, On the other side, are we to pay god? Do things happen for a reason even though they don't make sense to us? There are people in prison who are... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Union City, NJ
No, but we shouldn't have to give them a wonderful prison environment. Essentials to live: bread, water. If they admit or there is a video of them committing murder then we should not kill them...make them live in a cell with nothing but their thoughts. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Foley, MN
Yes, if there is a significant chance, based on mental disposition or initial motive, that he/she will kill again. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Westminster, CA
If one murders a child,elderly person or a disabled person. also if one tortures or sexually assaults victims before killing them. 6 years ago from a Republican in Ozark, AL
I support the death penalty if the execution occurs within 2 years of sentencing. Lengthy death row sentences do not deter violent crime. 6 years ago from a Republican in Sweet Water, AL
Life in prison for heinous crimes; more suffering. 6 years ago from a Republican in Lexington, SC
Yes, not only because of the economics of housing prisoners but because some of them want to die anyway. Any death is terrible, but I still see the economic factors of it. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Newton Falls, OH
Yes, but only if the criminal cannot be stopped through incarceration or rehabilitation. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Parlin, NJ
Only when the person is likely to escape and continue to commit more crimes (ie Ted Bundy). 6 years ago from a Green in Milwaukee, WI
There a people who have done heinous things to other people that perhaps don't deserve to live on...but it costs the system (ie me) too much money for these cases and, heaven forbid, there could have been an error and an innocent is put to death. ... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Rochester, NY
Yes, but only if a stricter burden of proof is used than beyond a reasonable doubt. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Spring Valley, NY
Depending on the persons criminal record if they kill or do any major crime and goes psycho then yes they should be put to death otherwise no because they need to learn their lesson in prison for life; they're humans too. 6 years ago from a Green in Blytheville, AR
Yes, but only when the crime has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt! Innocent people should not have to pay the price for a crime just because the true criminal has not been caught and the suspect fits the profile. Just the same, viscious criminals... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Brandon, MS