More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Race (Asian) voters
Last answered 16 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Race (Asian) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Race data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by thefreethoughtproject.com
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
5 years ago by afr.com
5 years ago by smh.com.au
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
5 years ago by bbc.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Only in circumstances where there is no other way to prevent imminent danger to other's lives. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Houston, TX
Yes and no. If they have dna and a confirmation of the crime then it could be a tooth for a tooth, On the other side, are we to pay god? Do things happen for a reason even though they don't make sense to us? There are people in prison who are... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Union City, NJ
Yes, but only if convicted of treason. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Stanford, CA
Yes, if there is a significant chance, based on mental disposition or initial motive, that he/she will kill again. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Westminster, CA
No, because punishment of life in prison would have a much greater effect on criminals. It would give them a chance to think about their crime and reflect on what they did. This also gives the falsely accused a chance at escape. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Bala Cynwyd, PA
No death penalty, but the person being tried for the crime has the right to request death (similarly to terminally ill patients) if they wish to die instead of living out a sentence. Federal Government cannot kill people, it is not moral even if it is... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Minneapolis, MN
No, because that's just a horrible way to be killed. The suspect should have a choice to either get the death penalty?...it depends on what their charges are. I feel like it's never about...actually giving evidence about why the suspect is... 6 years ago from a Republican in Washington, DC
Only in the case of extremely heinous crimes that can be proven beyond any doubt - more definitive than only eye-witness testimony. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Spring, TX
Only if the criminals are minorities. 6 years ago from a Republican in Venice, CA
An eye for an eye. Equal sentencing for the crime. 6 years ago from a Green in Montrose, CA
The Federal Government does not have the right to pick someone up off the streets, put them in a cage and then murder them, no matter what they've done. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Laguna Niguel, CA
No, but murderers should have HARD LABOR sentences (no internet). 6 years ago from a Republican in Coyote, CA
Only in cases of irrefutable evidence, including finger prints, DNA, video or audio, photos from security surveillance and eyewitness testimony. Also double proof that the prosecutor has turned over all exculpatory evidence to avoid killing someone who... 6 years ago from a Democrat in New York, NY
Yes, but only for cases where the perpetrator has a diagnosed mental condition linked to multiple violent criminal acts, which cannot be treated. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Medina, WA
No government, neither state nor federal, should permit death as a response for punishment. It is only justified in an emergency. 6 years ago from a Republican in New York, NY
Only if there is impending consequences that would happen if the person would not be put to death (i.e; If they were a super villain and/or had no control over their said superpowers). 6 years ago from a Democrat in Dexter, MI
I believe that the death penalty is not applied fairly, majority are minorities and murders who commit heinous crimes are more likely to get deals instead of the death penalty; such as Gary Ridgeway etc. 6 years ago from a Green in Alexandria, LA
No, but on some necessary cases. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Minneapolis, MN
Leave it up to the state with regards to state crimes; allow the death penalty for federal crimes for which it is a reasonable penalty. I do believe the death penalty is a reasonable punishment for some crimes. 6 years ago from a Republican in Newcastle, OK