More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income (over $200K) voters
Last answered 15 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income (over $200K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 18, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by thefreethoughtproject.com
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
5 years ago by afr.com
5 years ago by smh.com.au
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
6 years ago by bbc.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Only in circumstances where there is no other way to prevent imminent danger to other's lives. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Houston, TX
It depends on what it is like if someone killed somebody harsh they should suffer the same sentence. 6 years ago from a Green in Hopkins, MN
The prison system should be reformed altogether, more similarly to the Danish prison system. Criminals should be provided an opportunity within the prison complex to have a path to employment and learning skills that would benefit them, increasing their... 6 years ago from a Libertarian in El Macero, CA
No, unless we can reform the process to make it significantly less expensive than it is currently (several million dollars per execution). 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Auburn, CA
For Federal cases where the Federal government has jurisdiction, then yes. If it is a State issue that somehow has found its way to a Federal court, then it should be a State determination. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Colbert, WA
Yes, but only if convicted of treason. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Stanford, CA
Yes and don't let murders sit on death row for decades. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Clarkston, GA
No, because that's just a horrible way to be killed. The suspect should have a choice to either get the death penalty?...it depends on what their charges are. I feel like it's never about...actually giving evidence about why the suspect is... 6 years ago from a Republican in Washington, DC
Only in the case of extremely heinous crimes that can be proven beyond any doubt - more definitive than only eye-witness testimony. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Spring, TX
Only if the criminals are minorities. 6 years ago from a Republican in Venice, CA
DNA evidence has shown that wrong people are sometimes imprisoned or executed. It should be allowed only if there is more than circumstantial evidence to make a conviction. 6 years ago from a Republican in East Meadow, NY
Only if it's absolutely 100% proven without the possibility of false accusation and after every detail is exhausted. Because once the person is executed, they can't answer any more questions.. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Allen, TX
Yes, but only in certain circumstances in which a heinous crime has been committed and there is DNA evidence against the person. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Hanover, NH
It depends. A four year shouldn't be killed, but a person who's committed atrocitites like Hitler needs to die. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Dover, NJ
It depends on both how bad the crime is/was and how long the minimum sentence would be. Sentencing someone to 150 yrs of prison IS a death penalty, just slow and torturous. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Wilmette, IL
They should die the way that they killed someone else. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Columbia, MO
Yes, but only if someone killed someone, or raped someone. 6 years ago from a Republican in Columbia, MO
The Federal Government does not have the right to pick someone up off the streets, put them in a cage and then murder them, no matter what they've done. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Laguna Niguel, CA
Yes, but only when concrete evidence can be proven and held against the defendant. 6 years ago from a Republican in Studio City, CA
Only in cases of irrefutable evidence, including finger prints, DNA, video or audio, photos from security surveillance and eyewitness testimony. Also double proof that the prosecutor has turned over all exculpatory evidence to avoid killing someone who... 6 years ago from a Democrat in New York, NY
No government, neither state nor federal, should permit death as a response for punishment. It is only justified in an emergency. 6 years ago from a Republican in New York, NY
Only if there is impending consequences that would happen if the person would not be put to death (i.e; If they were a super villain and/or had no control over their said superpowers). 6 years ago from a Democrat in Dexter, MI
Only as a last resort -- i.e., prison has proved to be incapable of protecting society from him/her. This would include crimes committed while serving a life sentence, or jailbreaks while serving a life sentence, or perhaps directing a murderous... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Alexandria, VA