More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income (over $200K) voters
Last answered 3 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income (over $200K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Apr 10, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
6 years ago by sciencealert.com
6 years ago by npr.org
6 years ago by washingtonexaminer.com
6 years ago by filmsforaction.org
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by huffingtonpost.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
No, we should cut foreign aid first. 7 years ago from a Republican in Pewee Valley, KY
Cut the federal work force by 25 %. 7 years ago from a Republican in New York, NY
Cut redundant programs that have overlapping missions and objectives. Centralize authority and command into clear channels of authority. 7 years ago from a Republican in Mechanicsburg, PA
No increase taxes on the wealthiest 5% Americans and gradually increase the retirement age. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Wynnewood, PA
The private sector should have the opportunity to see what is going to whom in public spending and some of the overspending and fraudulent spending should be stopped! Such as the ridiculous spent on building materials and such in government buildings,... 7 years ago from a Democrat in Vancouver, WA
Reduce the size of the Federal government, thereby spending will be reduced. 7 years ago from a Green in Medford, OR
Cuts in public spending can be made at a slow rate, allowing those who depend on the current system time to find alternatives, and time for alternatives to be created. 7 years ago from a Republican in Provo, UT
No, put 80% of the military budget into public infrastructure instead. 7 years ago from a Green in Ridgewood, NY
Decrease government hand out projects to foreign countries and cut welfare to drug tested moms to cover only 2 kids, if mom can work add subsidy, cut al freebies to foreign students and border jumpers!. 7 years ago from a Republican in Houston, TX
No, the federal government should make cuts to defense spending instead. 7 years ago from a Green in Coraopolis, PA
Increase taxes overall but only use the revenue to reduce the debt. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Hendersonville, TN