More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($150K-$200K) voters
Last answered 13 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($150K-$200K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Apr 10, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by sciencealert.com
5 years ago by npr.org
5 years ago by washingtonexaminer.com
5 years ago by filmsforaction.org
5 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by huffingtonpost.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
They need to cut the private government spend and extended wages and benefits after government employees now longer hold a seat. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Titusville, FL
No, we should cut foreign aid first. 6 years ago from a Republican in Pewee Valley, KY
Spending should be reviewed on an individual basis and taxes should be increased in some instances. 6 years ago from a Green in Fort Lauderdale, FL
Cut the federal work force by 25 %. 6 years ago from a Republican in New York, NY
Yes, but not cuts to programs the promote jobs, economic growth, or those that help those out of work. 6 years ago from a Green in Glencoe, MO
Cut redundant programs that have overlapping missions and objectives. Centralize authority and command into clear channels of authority. 6 years ago from a Republican in Mechanicsburg, PA
we need to address the National Debt but we need to do this by addressing the many different issues surrounding that debt. The two biggest issues with the National Debt are Social Security and Military Spending.
The issue with social security is an individual who receives those payments ends up taking more funds out of the program than what they put into it. We need to address this in order to be sure the system can survive. We cannot expect a system to work when everyone is taking more out of the money pot than what they are putting into it. The other issue is that the average length of life has increased since the program was put into place. This means we are sending out more checks over time than we have been in the past. To fix that we need to raise the age at which you start receiving those checks so it evens out.
The other issue we have is our bloated military spending. We spend more on our military than most major governments (some of those being our allies) do on theirs, combined.
There is no reason for military spending to that degree when we aren't fighting against anything. We are simply building tanks, ships, and Humvees to go sit in military bases unused. The military has told congress they don't need anymore equipment but congress just keeps pushing out new equipment because they come from states where the building of tanks, ships, and so on benefits them. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Staten Island, NY
Yes, except for the Defense. 6 years ago from a Republican in Saint Paul, MN
No, there should be cuts in budgets from already high-spending departments, like the Department of Defense. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Henderson, NV
Yes, but they should do so by increasing taxes equally across all income levels-even those on disability payment plans and unemployment. 6 years ago from a Republican in Lemoore, CA
The private sector should have the opportunity to see what is going to whom in public spending and some of the overspending and fraudulent spending should be stopped! Such as the ridiculous spent on building materials and such in government buildings,... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Vancouver, WA
They need to cut their spending , quit having a personal barber for congress that makes an incredible amount of money for example. they also need to quit giving out our tax money to any of congress etc. that hasn't worked for 20 years just like any... 6 years ago from a Republican in Mechanicsburg, PA
Reduce the size of the Federal government, thereby spending will be reduced. 6 years ago from a Green in Medford, OR
Elected officials should take a HUGE pay decrease and loose the extra "perks" after leaving office. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Apex, NC
They should cut government spending and government wadges and letting the government vote in their own wadge increase. 6 years ago from a Republican in Bountiful, UT
Cuts in public spending can be made at a slow rate, allowing those who depend on the current system time to find alternatives, and time for alternatives to be created. 6 years ago from a Republican in Provo, UT
We need to cut military spending by 5%, increase taxes on Americans who make between 250,000 and $400,000 by 2%. We then need to raise taxes on Americans who make between $400,001 and $750,000 by 4%. Finally, the U.S. needs to raise taxes on any American... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Tulsa, OK