In an effort to end the COVID19 pandemic many governments imposed vaccine mandates on people who wish to enter private businesses. Politicians who supported the mandates argued that it would stop the spread of CV19 and encourage people to get vaccinated against it. Opponents argue that vaccination status is private health information and people should not be forced to share it. Proponents argue that unvaccinated individuals are responsible for spreading CV19 and prolonging the pandemic.
57% Yes |
43% No |
57% Yes |
43% No |
See how support for each position on “Vaccine Mandates for Customers” has changed over time for 19.5k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Vaccine Mandates for Customers” has changed over time for 19.5k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@92RXBV52yrs2Y
No, this is a violation of HIPPA
@964MGDK2yrs2Y
No, loyal paying customers should not have to reveal their vaccination status in order to receive goods and services from a business.
@8ZFVKPD2yrs2Y
Private businesses shouldn't exist
@92TLYSB2yrs2Y
Yes, But the customers don't have an obligation to answer
@996HHKG1yr1Y
Depending on the business.
@95WPRMN2yrs2Y
Yes, but customers have the right to refuse to answer.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…