More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 4 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 5, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by theguardian.com
5 years ago by csmonitor.com
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by co.nz
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by cbc.ca
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
“No, he should face a trial where ALL evidence for and against him is presented and a jury will determine whether his motives were to benefit the American Public. The CIA and NSA directors should also be investigated and relieved of duty and... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Sweet Home, OR
He should be given Whistleblower status for revealing crimes against the People of the United States, but held accountable for secrets divulged regarding U.S. spying of other countries. NSA and CIA directors should by tried for treason and made an... 6 years ago from a Republican in Las Vegas, NV
Yes, not only should he be protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act, but the directors of the CIA, NSA, and quite possibly the FBI need to be investigated. We had no idea how much our rights were being violated before his leak. The American people... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Elgin, TX
I don't believe that we have enough fact to know. But if he is willing to come back and face trial, he should be guaranteed that he will not do more than 3 yrs in min. security prison. 6 years ago from a Republican in Lansing, MI
No He is a traitor and should be tried and hung. He had means to legally follow yet chose not to go to. He also is trading in information to get deals he wants from other countries prove he is a traitor. 6 years ago from a Republican in Las Vegas, NV
No, but he should be returned to the US to stand trial and we should also still investigate the CIA and NSA directors and their activity. 6 years ago from a Republican in Berkeley, IL
I don't know - there is too much unknown (which we cannot rightly know) for the average person to base an informed opinion on this. (I prefer to have informed opinions, not just an opinion yelled to me from FOX "news" talking heads.). 6 years ago from a Democrat in Martinsburg, WV
The CIA, NSA and Snowden should be investigated. Snowden should get immunity if his information is accurate and if it can be proven that he did not release this information as an act of evil. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lincolnwood, IL
Yes, but only as long as the unreleased information is recovered and only reviewed by individuals who have the best interests of the U.S. at heart, not left to everyone who may look to destroy the American way of life. 6 years ago from a Democrat in El Segundo, CA
Yes, if he did not compromise US security (I have not read ALL of the documents he has or has released) I am not shocked by the fact that the NSA is spying on Americans and others, the NSA should probably be de-constructed along with the entire... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Florence, SC
Not sure yet, waiting for all facts to come out. 6 years ago from a Republican in Conyers, GA
It doesn't matter there are still unknown programs. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Conroe, TX
Immunity should not be the issue. He committed no crime. He did exactly what the government requested individuals to do: if you see it, report it. This should also apply if the government is committing an unethical, illegal, or immoral act.. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Wasilla, AK
I don't think he should be granted immunity, but he didn't comment treason either. We are all better for knowing how over-reaching our government has become. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Little Rock, AR
Yes, as long as no further state secrets are disclosed. 6 years ago from a Republican in Denver, CO