More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Associate's Degree voters
Last answered 1 hour ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Associate's Degree voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 15, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by cbsnews.com
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
6 years ago by firstpost.com
6 years ago by dailymail.co.uk
6 years ago by indiatimes.com
6 years ago by ijreview.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, but also return the election of Senators back to the state legislatures. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Odenton, MD
Yes, but only if you also have a law that prohibits lawmakers from working as lobbyists for at least 10 years after they leave office. 6 years ago from a Green in Old Orchard Beach, ME
Yes but there should be large window for them to serve and it should be phased in. Legislating is a complicated process that could be thrown into turmoil if too many congressmen do not have enough experience. 6 years ago from a Republican in Burnsville, MN
Limit the number of successive terms to two. After that they must take an election cycle off. They can run again after that one term break. 6 years ago from a Republican in Saint Robert, MO
One term only, no benefits, no retirement, minimum wage paid to public servants, office holder to pay staff out of their own pocket, staff may only serve one term. Anybody running for office has to choose which office to run for. May not sever as a... 6 years ago from a Republican in Dallas, TX
House of Representatives should be elected every 3 to 4 years. Now they spend too much time raising money to be re-elected every two years. No term limits to those conscientiously doing the peoples' work. 6 years ago from a Republican in Brewster, MA
Yes, a person should only be allowed to serve a total of 12 years in the house and 12 years in the senate. 6 years ago from a Republican in West Branch, IA
There should be term limits and no benefits. Those serving need to go back to their former professions after they serve their time in office. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Newport, WA
It depends on the office. So much of the person's energies goes toward the next reelection that the common person's issues may not be addressed. If a person in Congress consistently reelected, and we are sure that the elections were held... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Wakefield, MA
Term limits tend to make politicians care less when they can't be re-elected. No limits means people can spend a lifetime in government and lose touch with real life.
I therefore favor mandatory one-term sabbaticals every two terms for members of... 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Bothell, WA
Abolish representative democracy in favor of a direct consensus system of informal voting by freely associated individuals. 6 years ago from a Socialist in Portland, OR
No, the President should not have term limits. 6 years ago from a Green in Connellsville, PA
No but limit time spent in positions of power. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Deland, FL
Yes, term limits are a vitally necessary political apparatus to prevent corruption in our government. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Southwest Brevard Cnty, FL
Politicians should be able to run as long as the people vote for them, but people need to become more educated on the people they vote for. 6 years ago from a Republican in Lincoln, NE
Yes, but only for conservatives. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Portland, OR
No, but it should be easier to remove a member from their seat following poor performance, scandal, abuse of power, public opinion, etc. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Big Lake, MN
Yes, Limit to 24 years of service. Our forefathers never meant for service to be a career. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lincoln, NE
No, but make the Congressman's political views and stances more open to the public and incentivize voting. 6 years ago from a Republican in Somerville, NJ
Yes, and make them subject to Obamacare and Social Security. No more lifetime handouts. 6 years ago from a Green in Port Clinton, OH
We already have term limits. They're called "elections.". 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Jacksonville, FL
No, but Senators should be elected by state legislatures as they were intended to be in the first place. 6 years ago from a Republican in West Chester, OH
Yes, but it won't prevent corruption; it will only add new voices more often. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Annandale, MN
No. Term limits is not the problem/solution. The problem is private money in the elections. 6 years ago from a Green in Camillus, NY
Only by constitutional amendment. 6 years ago from a Republican in Sand Springs, OK
Yes, term limits would promote healthy politics. Incumbents may run/ballot with 70% majority pre-election override. 6 years ago from a Republican in Severn, MD