More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 11 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 15, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by cbsnews.com
5 years ago by indiatimes.com
6 years ago by firstpost.com
6 years ago by dailymail.co.uk
6 years ago by indiatimes.com
6 years ago by ijreview.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes, but a mechanism for individuals who are widely considered beneficial should be put in place (i.e. constituents for outside their voting base should sign a petition allowing them to stay in congress). 6 years ago from a Democrat in El Segundo, CA
No, there is already too much power in the unelected elite who tell Congress what to do. Get rid of lobbying from anyone except individual citizens, not industries and foreign governments. (Let Congress seek out information and hear all sides, but NO... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Florence, SC
No, but members of Congress should not be allowed to work in businesses related to bills they authored (or for which they authored amendments) or to committees upon which they served for at least 8 years after leaving Congress. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Piedmont, CA
Should go back to the old system where the Federal Reps were elected out of the state legislatures instead of separate polls. This would reduce the hold of the parties on our government. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Springdale, AR
Yes, and we should stop paying and giving benefits to those sorry assholes after they leave office too. If I quit or get fired from a job they don't continue to pay me for my terrible performance. They are leeching off taxpayer dollars. 6 years ago from a Green in Chattanooga, TN
No, the American people need to understand that if they are unsatisfied with an elected officials performance they have a civic duty to try to vote that official out of office. Term limits are a passive aggressive way of saying to officials that the... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Walla Walla, WA
Yes, we need new views and debate within Congress. There's absolutely nothing going on right now. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Milwaukee, WI
No, but the American people should be made aware of any corruption from a nonpartisan source to make informed decisions during elections. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Panorama City, CA
No, but there should be competency tests before the elections for anyone who wants the job. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Auburn, WA
Yes. Increasing the number of congressmen/women who know their careers are over may break some of the gridlock. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Milwaukee, WI
Congress should not be paid sufficiently for politicians to become permanent elected officials; they should remain in their prior careers and only attend Congress for a short time each term. 6 years ago from a Republican in Beech Grove, IN
Yes, but only if it applies to all states or none at all. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Grand Terrace, CA
Voters already have the power with their vote, but they need to be informed. 6 years ago from a Republican in Marengo, OH
No. However our Congressional Representatives should be better scrutinized by those the represent. And our schools and social organization should immediately begin offering remedial education on the roles of our 3 (4) tierd Government. Americans are the... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
Yes, Limit to 24 years of service. Our forefathers never meant for service to be a career. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lincoln, NE
No if you are good at your job then why should you be punished. However the people need top take more accountability for their Congress people. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Beech Grove, IN
No. Term limits take a power from We the People and gives it to Big Government. 6 years ago from a Green in Auburn, WA
We should reduce the number of Congreessmen by 50% and save that money because it also eliminates hundreds if staff members as well, would like to see Senate terms to remain 6 years but limited to 3 terms and would like to see the House of... 6 years ago from a Republican in Lehigh Acres, FL
Yes, but only the Senate. 6 years ago from a Republican in Lansing, MI
Term limits should be for no more than 12 years to be served, after which a 6-year break should be required befor one could be voted back in. 6 years ago from a Republican in Monmouth, IL