80%
Yes
20%
No
76%
Yes
14%
No
4%
Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies
3%
No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions
2%
No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “NATO” has changed over time for 131k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “NATO” has changed over time for 131k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @8HR8JJF from Iowa answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the United States should not be responsible for funding 50% or more of NATO's operating budget.

 @8Q3YPW7 from Hawaii answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only on the condition that the other member states are required to maintain their budget quotas and armament preparation. The United States should no longer be the primary armer and cash cow for the alliance.

 @8WBW8DY from Idaho answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but pressure other countries to increase their financial contributions

 @98YQQNB from Kentucky answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but NATO should focus on the protection of developing countries and the like instead of bolstering capitalist interests

 @8M8BTP2 from Pennsylvania answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but we need to remove members that do not have NATO's best interests in mind or those nations that are not true allies (e.g. Turkey).

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “NATO” news articles, updated frequently.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.