More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Right voters
Last answered 5 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Right voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Sep 25, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by iflscience.com
6 years ago by elitedaily.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
The federal government should only do such to the alternative energy industries in the case that the industry is responsible, stable, and will have good benefits in the long term. 6 years ago from a Republican in Greer, SC
No, this source of energy should be left to the market. It will sink or fly on its own merits. The Federal Government should help people under the poverty level to access solar power and wind power for their homes--these subsidies would better help those... 6 years ago from a Republican in Tucson, AZ
They should have the same tax breaks as any other energy producing company. 6 years ago from a Republican in Leavenworth, KS
The same companies behind big oil are behind big wind. These are an eye sore to a beautiful areas. Trees are destroyed to be replaced by massive wind Mills. Millions of Tons of Concrete are poured for the pedestals, Birds and other small Animals lungs... 6 years ago from a Republican in East Olympia, WA
No the federal government needs to get out of the business business. Too much corruption. The private sector will handle just fine on its own. 6 years ago from a Republican in Palm Bay, FL
No, they should give tax credits to the nuclear power industry instead. 6 years ago from a Republican in Hilliard, OH
No. Wind farms are horrible looking. They kill many birds a year and they still monopolize energy in the hands of the super wealthy. Subsidize people to install small units on their own homes. 6 years ago from a Republican in Wellsville, NY
Yes, it creates jobs, but the government needs to be for all forms of energy to sustain our future. 6 years ago from a Republican in Hawley, TX
Yes but only with 10 year term loans that hold executives of such industries personally accountable with up to 100% of their personal assets if repayment is not made within the 10 year term. 6 years ago from a Republican in Sykesville, MD
Yes, but not to the point of picking winners and losers. Subsidies are meant to help businesses compete against monopolies but shouldn't go so far as to dictate our purchasing options. 6 years ago from a Republican in Fairfield, IA
No, however the government should invest more heavily in the use of alternative energy sources at the residential level. This would protect environments, improve energy security and improve homeowners' resiliency in the wake of a disaster. 6 years ago from a Republican in La Center, WA
No, the government should divest from energy technologies and allow the market to move to cheaper, more sustainable energy technologies. 6 years ago from a Republican in Arlington, VA