More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Household (single-father) voters
Last answered 1 hour ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Household (single-father) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Sep 25, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Household data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
6 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by theguardian.com
7 years ago by iflscience.com
7 years ago by elitedaily.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
No. Wind power is a flawed system w high maintenance cost and low out put. We should invest more into solar fields. Low cost with high yield. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Waimanalo, HI
End support for just one sector of the industry, but give credits and subsidies to power industries research to find cheaper, more reliable, sustainable, non-polluting, energy alternatives. Demand a phase out of oil, gas, nuclear and coal sources as... 7 years ago from a Republican in Granbury, TX
Yes, but reduce the amount it costs the federal government. This should be something that the farmers can get compensated for from power companies rather than the federal government. 7 years ago from a Republican in Macon, GA
No, the government should internalize all the externalities of all energy sources (e.g. introduce a carbon tax) and let the market decide. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Piedmont, CA
No, and the government should not provide subsides for any other forms of energy either. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Walla Walla, WA
All energy sources should be nationalized. Private ownership of resources and tax credits to private companies for that energy is fascism. It is a corporatist relationship that merges states and private interests. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Pensacola, FL
No, It has issues. Solar and other technologies need to be developed. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Lovejoy, MO
No, wind power can do more harm to the environment than good. 7 years ago from a Green in Denver, CO
The wind power industry is both an important alternative to coal and natural gas and the future of our economy based on the creation of jobs that it will bring. 7 years ago from a Democrat in California City, CA