More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Race (Other) voters
Last answered 24 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Race (Other) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Sep 25, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Race data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
- District of Columbia
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
6 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by theguardian.com
7 years ago by iflscience.com
7 years ago by elitedaily.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
No, the federal government should stop subsidizing a successful technology. 7 years ago from a Green in Pasadena, CA
No, the future of our economy relies on the creation of jobs in sustainable energy, but we should end support for failed technologies. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Richmond, TX
End support for just one sector of the industry, but give credits and subsidies to power industries research to find cheaper, more reliable, sustainable, non-polluting, energy alternatives. Demand a phase out of oil, gas, nuclear and coal sources as... 7 years ago from a Republican in Granbury, TX
Yes, if the oil industry can have tax credits and subsidies, then the wind power industry should receive the same incentives. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in San Antonio, TX
Subsidies should only be awarded to companies with proven achievement and only if it will benefit the entire nation and not just a few rich people who own stock in said company. Otherwise, nobody should get subsidies. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Cornelius, NC
Alternative energy is not a certain benefit for the U.S. Our power grids still require massive updates before they will be capable of storing the massive amounts of additional energy created by alternative sources.
I do believe that all alternative sources should be incentivized, but not before appropriate and necessary infrastructure has been developed. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Modesto, CA
Yes, but they should not pick which companies receive favorite status - it shoud be merit based. 7 years ago from a Republican in Wallingford, CT
No, the government should internalize all the externalities of all energy sources (e.g. introduce a carbon tax) and let the market decide. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Piedmont, CA
No, the government should let the free market determine the best energy sources. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Winter Park, FL
Yes, but not until we do comprehensive research on the long term effects of wind turbines on the ecosystem. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Alsip, IL
No, the government should divest from energy technologies and allow the market to move to cheaper, more sustainable energy technologies. 7 years ago from a Republican in Arlington, VA
No, wind power can do more harm to the environment than good. 7 years ago from a Green in Denver, CO
Yes, The byproducts of traditional energy such as coal ash dumping and nuclear meltdowns are incredibly detrimental to the environment and the populations health and welfare. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Columbus, OH