More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($150K-$200K) voters
Last answered 55 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($150K-$200K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Sep 25, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by youtube.com
5 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by iflscience.com
6 years ago by elitedaily.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
They should have the same tax breaks as any other energy producing company. 6 years ago from a Republican in Leavenworth, KS
Provide tax credits and subsidies for several alternative energy sources, not just wind power. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Ludlow, MA
Nuclear power should be subsidized. 6 years ago from a Socialist in West Newton, MA
Tax credits should be based on expanding/scaling technologies that have already demonstrated results in a laboratory setting. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Saint Paul, MN
The wind power industry can get its funding through customers and fundraisers. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Dover, NJ
No, they should give tax credits to the nuclear power industry instead. 6 years ago from a Republican in Hilliard, OH
Yes, provided that a solution is found for the impact to local fauna (windmills kill a lot of birds, particularly eagles). 6 years ago from a Green in Ramona, CA
No, deregulate and let the free market decide. 6 years ago from a Republican in San Diego, CA
Not until they find a way to store the energy created, and a longer-life option to these behemoths. They only last three years, on average, and cannot store their energy when alternative sources are saturated, like BPA and their substations. 6 years ago from a Democrat in West Linn, OR
No. The federal government should end all tax credits and subsidies to all businesses. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Mount Pleasant, SC
Yes, alternative energy is important, but wind farms are seriously harming bat populations, so we should also continue to look for less damaging options. 6 years ago from a Green in Fishers, IN
Yes, Subsidies for solar and other sustainable energies as long as they themselves are minimally detrimental to wildlife. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Paso Robles, CA
Yes but only with 10 year term loans that hold executives of such industries personally accountable with up to 100% of their personal assets if repayment is not made within the 10 year term. 6 years ago from a Republican in Sykesville, MD
Tax credits should be offered for a variety of alternative energies, not just wind power, but subsidies should not be unless there is tangible benefit that can be demonstrated for the country as a whole. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Atlanta, GA