Try the political quiz

Social Issues + Hate Speech

+
Expand
Start a discussion

Sort by

Filters

Current selected filters:

Choose more filters:

0
Replies

@Cody-KillianLibertarian from Nevada answered…2yrs

Yes, as long as it does not innately advocate or incite wide-spread violence.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Nick-StatutoLibertarian from Missouri answered…2yrs

No, but the accusation of hate speech should not be used as freely as it is either.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Dominic-Catanzar…Veteran from Indiana answered…2yrs

No, this imposes on others right to the pursuit of happiness, and discrimination.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Jim-BartonWomen’s Equality from Texas answered…2yrs

Can be said, but any consequences after-the-fact, are unpunished

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@5NBH83YPeace and Freedomfrom Missouri  answered…2yrs

Yes, but only if it does not threaten violence, discrimination or the constraint of the target's civil rights, or advoca...

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Nicolas-MannaVeteran from Kansas answered…2yrs

No, because you are trying to encourage or incite violence

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Sommer-HedgeDemocrat from New York answered…2yrs

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government and penalties should increase for hat...

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Justin-MooreLibertarian from South Carolina answered…2yrs

Yes, it goes against the First Amendment to not protect it since you are expressing yourself, but that doesn't make it r...

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Anthony-MorrillVeteran from New Hampshire answered…2yrs

hate speech isn't real.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Jose-BravoRepublican from California answered…2yrs

If it is towards the US no, it shouldn't be portected by the emendements they're comlaining about.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Dim-StarkRepublican from Arizona answered…8mos

To my understanding, it already is, except under very specific circumstances. In fact, the Supreme Court seems to have h...

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Seamus-WarshawCommunist from Virginia answered…2yrs

Yes, but the people should voluntarily discourage hate speech

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Zoe-KirkSocialistfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

No, hate speech poses a clear and present danger to its targets

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Zane-StevesIndependent from Virginia answered…2yrs

Hate and threat speech are not protected by the freedom of speech right.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Beth-Hollingswor…American from Texas answered…2yrs

Yes, as long as it is not an act that could be considered harrassment, and it does not threaten violence.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Jordann-Washingt…Peace and Freedom from Texas answered…2yrs

Hate speech should be monitored to see if a person is planning to act dangerously.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Jason-KolLibertarian from Utah answered…2yrs

Yes, so long as it does not incite violence or a violation of the law

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Everett-BlantonVeteran from Florida answered…2yrs

It depends on the context in which hate speech is used.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Michael-HannaVeteran from Texas answered…2yrs

No, so long as “hate speech” is not defined as “speech I don’t like” or “speech that offends me”

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Isaiah-ValverdeWomen’s Equality from Washington answered…2yrs

No, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Catherine-Lawren…Peace and Freedom from Maryland answered…2yrs

Things must be allowed to be spoken, but are also subject to harsh criticism, and those who enact hate speech should be...

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Henry-MoorehouseRepublican from Texas answered…2yrs

No, but the phrase "hate speech" should be clearly defined and agreed upon by law makers.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Rachel-BoiceWorking Family from Georgia answered…2yrs

We should pay closer attention to hate speech, but I don’t trust the government that they wouldn’t take it too far.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Benjamin-Shaplei…Democrat from Arkansas answered…2yrs

Yes; however "speech" defined strictly is verbal. No one can take that from you. Written word is subject to the discreti...

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

0
Replies

@Bill-HughesDemocrat from Ohio answered…2yrs

No, freedom of speech ends when you harm another person's rights.

AnswerSocial IssuesHate Speech

Show more