Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MMKDKD from California answered…6hrs6H

Only charge the new builds in the area. Don’t punish owners that have been in the area before congestion occurred

 @SenBR2003from New York  answered…10hrs10H

No, but require car companies to design vehicles so that users have the option to exert full human control over their ve…

 @9MMBLNN from Michigan answered…14hrs14H

Only if they are going to make it easier and cheaper for lower income individuals to buy hybrid/electric cars

 @9MM7NMZ from Minnesota answered…16hrs16H

I think it could be a good idea to incorperate such ideas, but I also think that people could become to reliant on self-…

 @9MM6FRH from Illinois answered…17hrs17H

Not until they’ve proven they can actually get the job done according to their set project timeframe.

 @9MM5PH4 from New Jersey answered…17hrs17H

Yes, but do not waste resources on our infrastructure.

 @9MM5PH4 from New Jersey answered…17hrs17H

No, cities should encourage people to use other forms of transportation instead to reduce congestion.

 @9MM5PH4 from New Jersey answered…17hrs17H

Yes, If it distracts the drivers ability to drive carefully to avoid accidents and distracted driving.

 @9MM2WQ3 from California answered…19hrs19H

There needs to be more forms of reliable public transportation for this to be implemented effectively

 @9MLY32X from New York answered…19hrs19H

Yes, but ensure safety regulations and protecting the environments it impacts.

 @9MM288V from New Jersey answered…19hrs19H

This should be implemented once they fix the public transportation system.

 @9MLZWJF from Connecticut answered…20hrs20H

If they can be run on hydrogen or another source of energy that doesn't harm the environment as much then yes.

 @9MLZQLY from Washington answered…20hrs20H

I think that Ai in control of a car isnt a bad idea because it could prevent a good handful of accidents.

 @Dry550 from Illinois answered…21hrs21H

Yes, but don’t discourage people from using personal vehicles, market it as a convenience, not a necessity

 @Dry550 from Illinois answered…21hrs21H

Yes, both sides make a strong case, however, people should be able to get around faster and comfortably rather than walk…

 @Dry550 from Illinois answered…21hrs21H

Yes, test vigorously before deployment, account for any accident scenarios and make upgrades and updates regularly while…

 @Dry550 from Illinois answered…21hrs21H

Yes, make it affordable for people to use, and the investment is worth it to minimize time it takes to travel

 @Dry550 from Illinois answered…21hrs21H

Yes, a limit can potentially save human lives. Placing a cap on what technology can control is not hindering progress, i…

 @9MLWRVL from Georgia answered…21hrs21H

I think yes, but only to see if it encourages use of public transportation

 @9MLTWNN from New York answered…21hrs21H

Yes, it would depend on what she caused by being on her phone. If someone was texting on a backroad and gets pulled over…

 @9HCFTMC from Arizona answered…22hrs22H

Yes, but incentivize companies to make the electronic cars more efficient and usuable in our society

 @9MLV5S4 from Iowa answered…22hrs22H

I think that there are some features that should be taken out of cars and some that should stay for safety reasons

 @9MLV4MV from Ohio answered…22hrs22H

No, this would not help reduce traffic or pollution

 @9MLTRG7 from North Carolina answered…22hrs22H

no because traffic is normal and isnt only caused by how many people are driving

 @9MLTK9D from North Carolina answered…23hrs23H

Some people can't afford even the easiest things so it would be a mistake to do this.