Nuclear Energy

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.

Nuclear Energy

Sort by

Filters

Options

Yes, as long as they are built farther from populated places. It's not the worst but also not the BEST.

yes and no because it is better than coal and fossil fuels but the use of thorium would be way better

Yes, but it would be more efficient and friendlier to the environment to increase the amount of nuclear fusion plants an…

I don't like the use of nuclear weapons but if it comes down to long time wars or major wars and the enemy isn't giving…

although i don't necessarily support nuclear energy, there is also no such thing as "clean energy", and anything down to…

It depends what’s it used for war not so much but to advance the USA into the energy and the use of science yes

Yes, as long as they dispose of the waste in a safe and environmentally friendly way. This provides a solution until oth…

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About