Try the political quiz

17 Replies

 @OptimisticWelfareNo Labels from New Jersey commented…2wks2W

I love how clearly she resonates, instead of using the usual vague cliche-filled language I’m used to hear from politicians.

 @RightWingPieSocialist from Indiana commented…2wks2W

The USSR maintained a presence in Cuba after the missile crisis and Cuba remained part of the Eastern Bloc. By that measure, Ukraine in NATO but with no nuclear weapons stationed there would be ok.

 @DreadfulFreeTrade from Illinois disagreed…2wks2W

Yes. But the presence was radar stations, etc. There has been loose talk already of possible future anti-missile systems in Ukraine. These launchers could also be used for first-strike weapons. Given the short distances involved, this would translate into current decisions on responding to missile warnings (sometimes inaccurate) from 30 minutes, to 5.

 @OilAveryForward from Pennsylvania commented…2wks2W

Kallas is an embarrassing character, I think she and Baerbock are the most unpresentable politicians in the EU group

 @TradeTariffMusselDemocratfrom Tennessee commented…2wks2W

Russia has assassinated people on British soil using chemical weapons. Russia has disrupted telecoms systems and hacked European companies. They fire missiles against civilian targets in Ukraine. Their soldiers operate rape war crimes which have been validated. Russia is already at war with the West. How is the west responsible for anything other than seeking to prevent further acts of aggression? Russia and has already crossed every line. Honestly, Ukraine need the freedom to return fire in kind. Into Russian territory.

 @MindfulBureaucratMountain from Texas commented…2wks2W

Ah yes, 1962. History offers so many lessons. Only a few years earlier the Russians had beaten the Hungarians into submission when they wanted more freedom from Russia. They would, a few years later, do the same in Czechoslovakia.

What Russia is doing in Ukraine is what Russia does: intimidate, treaten, invade. The only way to stop them from doing so is to be strong enough, individually or collectively.

Hence why Estonia is so happy to be in NATO and why Ukraine wants to be in NATO.

 @MellowParrotLibertarianfrom Maine commented…2wks2W

She is ridiculous. Nearly a third of the country's population is Russian and the whole country amounts to 1.3 million people and GDP of less than 38 billion. If she were smart she would keep quiet since it will not be her country that will make a difference fighting the Russians.

 @P4rtisanMagpieForward from North Carolina commented…2wks2W

So russia has now invaded several neighbors in order to Balkanize them, but can’t have the same thing done to it?

That seems unfair.

 @D3m0cr4cyHazelLibertarian from New Jersey commented…2wks2W

Estonia went from being subsidised by the USSR, to being subsidised by the EU. And with the arrogance of "dictating" how other countries must be.

 @SquirrelRonPatriotfrom Indiana commented…2wks2W

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2wks2W

Should the opinions of a country's minority populations be a deciding factor in altering its borders?

 @9MN92PC  from New York answered…2wks2W

No, the majority vote has always been the winning vote, has it not ? Ignoring everybody else and focusing on one group is how almost ever empire or nation has fallen.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2wks2W

How would the world change if large countries were broken into smaller states based on cultural or ethnic lines?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...