Try the political quiz

8 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2wks2W

US lawmakers strike deal to boost aviation safety, will not hike pilot retirement age

https://deccanherald.com/business/us-lawmakers-strike-deal-to-bo…

The US House of Representatives in July voted 351-69 on a sweeping bill to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration that would hike the mandatory pilot retirement age to 67 but the Senate Commerce Committee had voted in February to reject the retirement age hike.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2wks2W

Lawmakers strike deal to boost aviation safety, will not hike pilot retirement age

https://ksl.com/article/lawmakers-strike-deal-to-boost-aviation…

U.S. House and Senate negotiators said early Monday they have reached a deal to boost air traffic controller staffing and boost funding to avert runway close call incidents, but will not hike the airline pilot retirement age to 67 from 65.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2wks2W

If you had to choose, would you support more funding for technology to prevent accidents or for hiring more air traffic controllers, and why?

 @9LYDB4PSocialist from California answered…2wks2W

I would choose funding for technology to prevent accidents, because it It is more reliable than air traffic controllers

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2wks2W

How do you feel about the decision to not increase the mandatory retirement age for airline pilots to 67; do you think experience or fresh perspectives are more important?

 @9LYDMZPGreen  from New York answered…2wks2W

We need both. Rather than having a specific age limit, I think individuals should have to complete more frequent pilot competency flight tests and reregistration as they age.

 @9LYDB4PSocialist from California answered…2wks2W

I feel the decisions shoud not increase because we do not need old people driving planes