Donald Trump has raised $75mn less for his presidential bid than Joe Biden and has 270,000 fewer unique donors now than at the same stage of his run for the White House four years ago.
The findings, from a Financial Times analysis of federal campaign data, raise new questions about how the former president’s shrunken base will sustain him through costly court cases and what is expected to be the most expensive presidential race ever.
The Trump campaign and affiliated political action committees have attracted roughly 900,000 donors from July 2023 through the first quarter of 2024, compared with 1.17mn donors in the equivalent period of the 2020 race, according to the FT’s analysis of federal data.
President Biden has also opened up a massive fundraising advantage, the data shows, raising $165mn over the first three months of the year — $75mn more than pro-Trump groups, which raised just under $90mn.
Biden had $146mn on hand at the end of March and has raised $368mn in this election cycle. Pro-Trump groups must provide numbers by a federal deadline on Saturday night. They had $65mn cash on hand at the end of 2023.
The findings come as both candidates step up their fundraising efforts with just under seven months to go before the November vote.
“President Trump raised more in Q1 when he was the incumbent president than Joe Biden has raised in Q1 as the incumbent president this year,” said Trump campaign spokesperson Karoline Leavitt. “Team Trump will continue to raise the resources necessary to win on November 5th.”
Money remains crucial in the months-long White House races, as candidates blitz swing states with multimillion-dollar ad campaigns before the vote. In 2020, Biden raised a record $1bn in donations, and Trump hauled in about $775mn, according to the non-profit Open Secrets.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
Should there be a limit on how much money a candidate can raise or spend on their campaign, and why?
@9LLVV2J2wks2W
I believe there should be a cap to this as one should not win based on money but rather the acceptance of their beliefs and morals on the direction of the country.
@CulturedSwanSocialist2wks2W
If anything this article epitomizes the decline in US democracy, with the US Supreme Court particularly to blame with their ill-thought through decision in the Citizen United case. Presidential elections, to a certain degree, can be rightly said to be bought.
@MindfulLocustDemocrat2wks2W
No sane political party would run again with the same candidate who has lost them the past three elections. The massive drop in donor numbers shows their own base is tired of his face.
Republicans aren’t a normal party anymore though. Even the RNC is staffed by Trump family members now. It’s like a mafia takeover.
@MindfulRhinoLibertarian2wks2W
Hmm oh my perhaps not everyone in the most powerful nation in the world wants a sleazy, lying, cheating, ally abandoning, hypocritical, sexist, weird, racist, orange, delusional used car salesman to be in charge? Hmmmm
@VotingLeoDemocrat2wks2W
Certainly still a big candidate for those who think rape not a big deal.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
