Try the political quiz

9 Replies

 @9HZ6GNN from California answered…4mos4MO

I think we wouldn't waste as much products and save alot of profit.

 @9J3MRMV from Hawaii agreed…4mos4MO

An increase in quality would mean an increase in prices. An increase in prices provides a natural incentive for people to take care of their possessions and replace them less often.

 @9J2GZMC from California agreed…4mos4MO

it would make the most sense to have things that last because when we have reliable things that will work for a long time we wont need to get new ones as often making it easier to not waste

 @9HZ8PQZ from Texas answered…4mos4MO

It would be way better, we wouldn't have to spend money as much, we can direct it to other stuff.

 @9J2CBVQ from Florida agreed…4mos4MO

If we didn't have to spend so much money on things tat could last as long as they could we could spend on things we need that might not have enough money for.

 @9HZ634N from Illinois answered…4mos4MO

I would definitely have more money because I wouldn't have to be replacing everything.

 @9HZ6WFL from California answered…4mos4MO

My daily choices would be impacted in a negative way. I would no longer be careful of the items that I would be using because they were made to last. Also. it would make me go outside less, to buy things, it would be able to save me money as well.

 @9HYC75N from California answered…4mos4MO

It would mean that the government will give you what they believe you need.

 @9HZQXBQ from Nebraska answered…4mos4MO

Everyday we make life choices that affect the environment, climate and other species