Try the political quiz

281 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would the dynamics of your local community change if all public spaces were privately owned?

 @9L39YFV from Utah answered…2mos2MO

Way less regulations, I think that in some cases there are too many restrictions.

 @9L39XDR from Louisiana answered…2mos2MO

I wouldn't have free places to go with my family and friends and sports leagues for kids would be harder.

 @9L3B95HDemocrat from Texas answered…2mos2MO

 @9L3B8WFRepublican from Texas answered…2mos2MO

I believe that it would be harder to go places for free making it harder to create plans.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

What personal values would guide your decisions if society operated on the principle of 'every individual for themselves'?

 @9KHV2XY from Georgia answered…2mos2MO

Laissez-Faire is a poor way of running your country. People often struggle climbing the rungs of the economical latter we've created in this country. The system of Laissez-Faire is designed to let the people do what they need to succeed and work coherently together, people are having to pull themselves from the bootstraps to survive in this country. Laissez-Faire could have worked then but in the new day of age, people need help.

 @9KHRPV8Peace and Freedom from Missouri answered…2mos2MO

Laissez-faire capitalism is characterized by a lack of government regulation and oversight in the market. According to economists who espouse laissez-faire, the market will determine the best products, prices, and wages without governmental interference. In the decades after the American Revolution, this economic approach gained prominence and became the main policy during America's Gilded Age in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Laissez-faire is frequently credited with bringing about the Industrial revolution and the American Titans of Industry, while also spurring the government oversight and regulation that still exists today.

 @9KHRF2Y from Wisconsin answered…2mos2MO

I would live off the land with my own small civilization and keep away from any govt.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How important is equal access to opportunities in your vision of a successful society?

 @9KSCYWZDemocrat from North Carolina commented…2mos2MO

I believe that equal access to opportunities doesn’t exist, everyone grows up differently and has different outcomes. However that doesn’t mean you can’t achieve the same thing as someone who has more money. It’s all about determination.

 @9KVLK54 from New York answered…2mos2MO

Equal access to opportunities would mean an increase in competition between others. This, however, is very important and beneficial to society, as it would also increase economic growth and societal progress.

 @9KV2S9C from Georgia answered…2mos2MO

Equal access to opportunities is very crucial for a successful society.

 @9KV2DFP from New York answered…2mos2MO

Equal access to opportunities is something very important however, it is unattainable since there is no agreeing on what qualifies as equal access or not.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

With no mandatory minimum wage, how would you negotiate your worth with potential employers?

 @9LBQSXY from Texas answered…1mo1MO

I would discuss my qualifications and how they set me apart from other potential applications, build a strong resume, and learn how to share my skillets.

 @9LBTD6M from Minnesota agreed…1mo1MO

When determining how much you get paid, it's important to show your employer that you have the experience to do a good job in a position. You should also get paid based on how good you are at your job because it brings productivity and profit to a business.

 @9LBLNH3 from Pennsylvania answered…1mo1MO

 @9LBLJRTRepublican from Wisconsin answered…1mo1MO

I would say my worth and give a good reason as to why I believe I should be negotiating about it.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Is it possible for an economy to be truly free, or are some restrictions necessary to protect workers and consumers?

 @9H5BMLF from North Carolina answered…6mos6MO

There are some restrictions that are necessary to protect workers and consumers. A economy will fall without certain restrictions therefore it is neccesary to implement some basic boundary structure.

 @9H5B27F from Florida answered…6mos6MO

 @9H5B585 from Florida answered…6mos6MO

 @9H5BQNQDemocratanswered…6mos6MO

No, an economy cannot be truly free; some restrictions are necessary to protect workers and consumers. We must have laws and regulations in our government to keep peace and order in our lives. We need some type of regulation to keep our country from becoming chaos.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

If given the option, would you choose job and financial freedoms over guaranteed government services and why?

 @9KF5CKGIndependent from Iowa answered…2mos2MO

 @9KF436S from Arizona answered…2mos2MO

I would choose guaranteed government services as it would help middle to lower class workers.

 @9KF42X3 from Arizona answered…2mos2MO

I would choose guaranteed government services as it would help middle to lower class workers.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How do you anticipate the impact on your daily life if public services like transportation ran entirely under private companies?

 @9HYKXYY from Utah answered…4mos4MO

 @9HYKKR2  from Texas answered…4mos4MO

It would be far more expensive, the practices would be more predatory due to a profit motive, and overall it would be much like the medical system of the U.S. (aka the biggest example of why privatization causes massive problems in industries that should stay public/are public in most locations.)

 @9HYKH8D from California answered…4mos4MO

It would be more calm when going shopping because most private companies work online.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would no government oversight over media and internet services affect the information you receive?

 @9HJW4DP from Wisconsin answered…5mos5MO

It would harm our children and even grown ups if they could watch bad stuff on places like TikTok.

 @9HJW45K from Ohio answered…5mos5MO

It would require a more judicious and meticulous approach to ensure digestion of the truth

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Is it fair for people to keep all the money they earn, regardless of economic inequalities that might arise?

 @9HF76QWIndependent from Indiana answered…5mos5MO

I believe increasing taxes on the rich as well as increasing taxes on luxury goods. The middle class and lower income families should have decreased taxes as current inflation and living expenses are currently detrimental to the middle and lower classes at this time.

 @9HF763M from Kansas answered…5mos5MO

Yes, it is fair for people to keep the money they earn. Taxation is simply left by force of government.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Imagine a world without subsidies for industries like farming; how would it influence what you eat?

 @9HJVPL7Republican from Pennsylvania answered…5mos5MO

This would influence things we consume on a daily basis. We get milk, eggs, meat, etc. from farms and it would change the way we eat. Not to mention the prices for those items would skyrocket due to the decrease in production.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

In an entirely free-market system, who should be responsible for helping those who cannot compete successfully—the individual or society?

 @9H4S2KC from Minnesota answered…6mos6MO

the government offers many things for people to pick themselves up and grow.

 @9H4RSDB from South Carolina answered…6mos6MO

The individual because they have to have the drive to succeed in life. They cannot just sit on their couch and be lazy.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

Would you prefer a job market that offers boundless opportunity, but with high risk, or stability with limited room for advancement?

 @9L8J2KY from New Mexico answered…1mo1MO

I would prefer a job that will keep me happy, give me the money I need to live on my own and be able to be financially stable in the American economy. In my mind I would like a boundless opportunity with a high risk job but living in America the risk could be from losing some money to not having a house to call home. You would be forced to choose a stable job with limited room for advancement.

 @9L8J2J2 from Minnesota answered…1mo1MO

stability with limited room because with the high risk we could all lose it all in a minute and it would be very hard to work back up.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

How do you think the absence of government labor laws would impact your future career goals?

 @9LBLF3X from Connecticut answered…1mo1MO

 @9LBL6GW from Ohio answered…1mo1MO

I believe in a capitalistic society to the extreme but to completely remove laws and regulations the safety and rights of the employees is at risk

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you think businesses should be free to operate without government rules if it leads to lower prices and more innovation?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...