Yes they should but it should directed to all races and not just certain ones
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics, and extend the requirement to private companies as well
No, these trainings are often not helpful and are used for legal reasons.
Yes, and cover all protected groups and have their topics in it.
Yes, and it should be in place for everyone in a position of power (boss, ceo, any police officer, hospital worker, et cētera)
Not until studies show it actually reduces discrimination
Yes and it should cover protected groups and minorities like the LGBT comunity
Yes, and to be racially color blind and tolerant of other ages, sexes, races, disabilities, sexual orientations, and religions.
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory, and also includes LGBTQ+ topics
@9VGHYLHRepublican12mos
No but if you know an employee is without a doubt and have proof he/she is racist to any one regardless of color they should be fired
I do, but I also think that companies should do extensive background checks to ensure that racial sensitivity training shouldn't be needed in the first place.
No, it wastes time for employees who aren't discriminatory, just ensure discrimination won't be accepted
I Don't understand what this means
No, but have strict guidelines and accountability concerning discrimination on any basis not relevant to the codified procedure - even those not pertaining to faith, race, sex, disability, or sexual orientation. Agency policy can mandate asking a few hypothetical questions to determine likelihood of guideline compliance.
No, and get rid of all this forced diversity bs.
Any an all form of sensitivity training only makes a person more prone to that type of activity in which it is training against.
No, There is a fine line between an offensive joke (Funny) and just being offensive (Not funny). These programs often forget that
no because if we are all about equality then we should all be treated the same.
No because while the issue is important to me, corporate sensitivity training is often hollow and rife with half baked assertions. This training should have been provided in education.
Learn to accept people dumbass
No, simply because studies show that the training is ineffective.
The federal level is too broad to determine what training is needed for an individual group of employees. Better for the government to have trainings on this and other topics ready and available, to be deployed as needed/wanted by Federal departments.
No, we shouldn't create "racial sensitivity" training programs.
No just don't be a ****
Only if it works both ways
Yes, as long as the training is designed to help minorities and not make relations between majorities and minorities worse.
All people regardless of race, age, religion, gender, ability should be treated with respect and equality.
I don't think it should be called sensitivity training, I think it should be about educating and informing those who might not know a lot, not about forcing people to be tolerant.
yeah do not be an ***
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and extend the requirement to private companies.
no because its telling you that your racist and that they are a victim we just need to learn to get along
Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well, along with LGBTQ+ topics
Yes, and include LGBT topics and how to cooperate and help mentally or physically disabled people effectively and everyone in federal government and private companies should have to go to help them understand this
I don’t have enough information to make an opinion.
Yes, only if they accept federal funding.
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups and is based on critical race theory
No, trainings should be determined by each company, not the government.
no, "racial sensitivity training" hasn't proven to be very effective, it just causes the discriminatory person to rely on alternative micro-aggressions and play the victim for having to learn to treat others with genuine respect. this is more a mental health/empathy training kind of problem. political correctness doesn't apply well here because it does not encourage self-awareness.
I am uneducated on this.
Yes, and require topics on other minorities/discriminated groups and extend the requirement to private companies as well.
I think it needs to exist but not be federally enforced
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
Yes, however, it depends on the material content and how it's presented.
Ensure clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination. Suggest and encourage racial sensitivity training.
Only if an issue comes up
Only if an issue comes up
Yes, this should also be require by private companies and should include LGBTQ+ topics as well
Don’t know what that is.
No, Racial sensitivity training and critical race theory are innately racist.
YES, and include all minorities in this. This should also be required by private companies
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
